ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2008   #1
Hammer
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,647
Talking Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

I am installing the small tube Watson's this coming weekend (no cats at this point). I have the standard tune Haibeck chip. Anybody had that chip in and installed these headers? If so, did you have to have your Haibeck chip recalibrated for this install or was the chip OK?

I have the following mods:
Open Air Cleaner Lid and K & N Filter
Haibeck Standard Calibration Chip for a '91
Flowmaster #17115 Cat Back Exhaust
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #2
Z Factor
 
Z Factor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 2,647
Default Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

As I recall the chip needs to be re-calibrated for headers. His standard chip reduces fuel by 3% since the stock chip is rich at 6%. However for headers that would be where he returns it to.
This is one of the few things Mark does that I am not crazy about in that you need to pay extra to return the chip to 6% after he reduced it to 3%. He also has a "anti backfire" calibration for headers which he charges more for on top of his prices.
I think he should have at least a few chips for a header mod instead of having to re-calibrate and charge extra for it.

Z Factor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #3
FU
 
FU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Found Member
Posts: 4,327
Default Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

Give Marc a call about the chip.
Swain coat your headers also. You'll like it .
FU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #4
Hammer
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,647
Talking Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

Z and Fu, thanks for the input. I am looking for some realtime experience with this if possible. I plan on installing the headers and driving it to see if the recal is needed, checking plugs too. I have had good luck with Marc's chip as far as my current setup goes.
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #5
Jeffvette
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

You can get it redone by marc, although it's not needed right away. but if you get it sent out now, he can have it back to before you get it done.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #6
Hammer
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,647
Talking Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffvette
You can get it redone by marc, although it's not needed right away. but if you get it sent out now, he can have it back to before you get it done.
Good point, thanks. I think I'll give him a call.
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #7
Hammer
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,647
Talking Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

Just called Marc, sending the chip off today. Thanks guys.
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #8
Z Factor
 
Z Factor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 2,647
Question Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
Just called Marc, sending the chip off today. Thanks guys.
Did he adjust it for the headers and anti-backfire, and if so did he charge extra as he has in the past?
Z Factor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #9
Hammer
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,647
Talking Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z Factor
Did he adjust it for the headers and anti-backfire, and if so did he charge extra as he has in the past?
Yes and yes.
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008   #10
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
Default Re: Watson Headers/Haibeck Chip

I had a Marc Randolph chip in my car when I added Watson headers. I found that I needed to reduce the timing due to eliminate the knock retard. After putting the headers on, the trap speed didn't change. The ECM was backing off the timing. After modifying the Sprak Advance tables, I was able to pick up about 4mph in trap speed. FYI. I would do a "before" and "after" and a scan.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2025