![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 835
|
![]()
http://www.zr1specialist.com/HAT%20W...r%20sensor.htm
Has anyone done this mod themselves? Did it make a difference? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
it very easy, not sure you will notice seat of the pants improvement, but every little bit helps. I put mine down in the well by the secondary vac pump reading outside air
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 Last edited by LGAFF; 12-06-2015 at 10:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,169
|
![]()
Moved mine to the plastic filter housing
![]()
__________________
Steve 1990 Steel Blue/Black #2355 1990 Red/Red #1473 1991 Quasar /Black #118 Sold 1991 Turquoise/Black #766 Parted Out 1993 Yellow/White #179 Sold 1990 Black/Gray #1361 Headers/4:10s Sold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
|
![]() Quote:
Locating the MAT further upstream of the intake air charge provides a more consistent Intake Air Temperature signal BUT you cannot take advantage of it unless the calibration is modified to reflect that change. The stock calibration is expecting a nominal temperature of ~ 80C. At that those temps, the ECM uses intake air and coolant temps in equal parts to modify fueling. Relocation of the sensor effectively eliminates sensor readings of anything above 40C or 130F. At this temp, the ECM is using the Intake Temp over the coolant temp to regulate or modify the fueling. The result is that the motor will run richer than it should be. The purpose of the MAT/IAT is to help ECM regulate fueling so that it is consistent over a wide spectrum of intake air/coolant conditions. IMO, not worth doing unless the calibration is modified to accommodate the relocation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lake Bluff, IL
Posts: 2,133
|
![]()
I did this early on with the '93 (back in '95) and on the '95 Marc located it down in the grille opening. Can't say that one item makes a noticeable difference but it is logical that a more consistent and accurate ambient temp reading will feed better data to the engine computer. One of the little things that add up to a better running Z. --Bob
__________________
2016 Long Beach Red Z06 #10281 "POPS Z" 1995 Polo Green #409 "WARP TEN"--Haibeck 350/510 package, 4.10s, Hurst, Stock Exhaust with QTP Cutouts --Sold but still running strong 1993 Quasar Blue #161 "HIL KING" --Sold but still running strong, now with more than 120,000 miles 1967 Marlboro Maroon/Saddle Corvette Coupe 300 hp/4-spd --Sold a long time ago ZR-1 Net Registry Founding Member #95 NCM Lifetime Member Favorite Quote--Attributed to Mickey Thompson: "Too Much Horsepower is Almost Enough" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]()
And, what if the TB coolant is bypassed. The temp of the air horn is very close to ambient air temperature; within a few seconds of run time. I wonder about the impact (if any) that has? Hummmm....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 835
|
![]()
Is this saying a possible 10 HP gain from moving it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
Not sure if its a gain, or just not losing it to heat soak....so its not pulling timing. It takes 30 minutes to do and less than $20....can't hurt
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 835
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|