![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
After trying a few belts looks like 69.5 to 70" 6 rib is what you need.
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lone Pine, CA
Posts: 580
|
![]()
nice info . do you have to take the compressor of to do the deleet?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
I would not think so, I am dropping weight on the car too
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 812
|
![]()
I went with a 67". Haven't tried it yet, so we'll see.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
I tried 67, 68 1/8.....no go.....used a belt for O"REilly Auto parts K060695, which is 70". Anything over 69 would probably work.
Engine should fire in the next week or so, I will post if the belt works Pete thought it was 66-67, but he might have UD pulleys
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
|
![]() Quote:
Lee,i mixed up the #'s since i used the no A/C belt for a short period till i had to use a 57" without water pump that's why i had the number 7 in mind but your right it's 69.5" with no A/C and 57' with no A/C and no water pump. A little secret about belt part #'s K060695 the first 6 means ribs the 695 means 69.5 inches some might have these #'s in different order but mean the same. Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 812
|
![]()
anybody wanna buy a 67" belt.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
|
![]()
I might have my old 69 belt if you want it.
![]() Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: I live at Devens, one run at a time
Posts: 454
|
![]()
I just got a NAPA 60690 (believe that's Gates) 69" to finish my A/C delete (with stock other pullies), after not finding this thread and working my way through each part number from 67.2 on up.
I should have measured it but since it was my 5th try and I have an event Sunday I didn't take the time LOL. I did find the sticker's advice about coming from the back of the water pump is a little tougher to do with no AC as there's very little distance from the PS to the WP. And with a camber brace it's even more fun but it did work, pretty much as it should. Seems to put the tensioner about 2/3rds of its' sweep. I almost got the 68.5 (60685) to work but would have had to pin the tensioner or find a third hand. I'm almost anal enough to try a paint dot on a pulley and the belt to make sure it's not a harmonic length but not quite LOL! Cheerio, - Jeff |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,884
|
![]()
I believe that belts get particularly complicated because construction is actually 'metric' but they get part numbered in generally an 'approximate' SAE dimension.
Goodyear I believe still puts both on the sleeve. Here's the Gatorback references: http://www.goodyearep.com/productsdetail.aspx?id=3128 A 69" sales spec is actually closer to 69.1 - it matters sometimes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|