ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2012   #71
Polo-1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 952
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hib Halverson View Post

As for what engine package I might do for the engine in Barney, the purple '95? I've studied all the posts here and I've traded emails with Marc Haibeck, Graham B. and Jim Van Dorn. I've decided the best bang for the buck as far as performance and durability will come with a boring old 368.
Some of the top LT5 builders.

They will make you a very nice 425-435 rwhp 368ci. in the $20-23K range.

You do know Pete makes more power with a stock 350ci. right
Polo-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012   #72
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polo-1 View Post
Some of the top LT5 builders.

They will make you a very nice 425-435 rwhp 368ci. in the $20-23K range.

You do know Pete makes more power with a stock 350ci. right
Polo,

I'm making 435rwhp w my stock bottom 350, GVD ported heads(small ports), and Pete's intake cams. Marc is claiming 510chp w just his ported top end and heads, stock cams. One question is whether Hib needs to pass emissions w his LT-5?
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012   #73
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polo-1 View Post
Some of the top LT5 builders.

They will make you a very nice 425-435 rwhp 368ci. in the $20-23K range.

You do know Pete makes more power with a stock 350ci. right
To Pete (and Marc's) point... What used to be done with a 368 is eclipsed now by stock bottom and stock cammed and stock TB 350s with current porting and cam tuning now commonly achieved by those that have continued to push the envelope. And, the costs have come down measurably as well.

For $10k a closed deck block is possible. Porting, depending on personal skill, can be a DIY project, or for (about) $5k or $15k total, a 391 would be possible. Just seems (to me) to be such lost opportunity to pick up some serious performance gains, for roughly what a 368 used to cost 15-20 years ago...

Example:



And, with some minor improvements since discovered, maybe 440 RWHP may be in store for this stock bottom, stock cammed, stock TB motor.

Just sayin....

P.
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012   #74
Polo-1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 952
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by XfireZ51 View Post
Polo,

I'm making 435rwhp w my stock bottom 350, GVD ported heads(small ports), and Pete's intake cams. Marc is claiming 510chp w just his ported top end and heads, stock cams. One question is whether Hib needs to pass emissions w his LT-5?
Good to hear Marc has up'ed his game to a 430rwhp 350. As for the others I have not heard of any updated porting/cams...
Polo-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012   #75
Pete
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Workman View Post
To Pete (and Marc's) point... What used to be done with a 368 is eclipsed now by stock bottom,stock cammed and stock TB 350s with current porting and cam tuning now commonly achieved by those that have continued to push the envelope. And, the costs have come down measurably as well.

And, with some minor improvements since discovered, maybe 440 RWHP may be in store for this stock bottom, stock cammed, stock TB motor.

Just sayin....

P.

BINGO!!!!
&
Stock Nikasil is better.

Today 368 is worthless

Still waiting to hear the oil issue with closed deck,any documentation on this.

Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5
11.09 @ 129.27
11.04 @ 128.86
474RWHP 400RWTQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY
https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage

Last edited by Pete; 10-08-2012 at 01:02 PM.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012   #76
Jagdpanzer
 
Jagdpanzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,651
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

When comparing cost of a complete overhaul, with new OEM pistons, liners and rings, going the 368 route with good quality aftermarket piston/rings, rods and ductal iron liners is not significanty more expensive and has its advantages. Besides a little more displacement you can up the compression ratio to 12:1 for more power & torque and hone the liners installed the block using a modern deck plate honing methods for better piston and ring fit which helps with oil control. Aftermarket pistons also allow you to go with longer rods with the advantages a higher rod length ratio brings.
__________________
Phil Wasinger
1994 Torch Red ZR-1
WAZOO Member
George Braml Intake
Jagdpanzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012   #77
Kevin
 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,624
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

if the stock liner coating is good enough for the audi lemans team, it's good enough for me
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson
90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B"
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012   #78
Pete
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagdpanzer View Post
When comparing cost of a complete overhaul, with new OEM pistons, liners and rings, going the 368 route with good quality aftermarket piston/rings, rods and ductal iron liners is not significanty more expensive and has its advantages. Besides a little more displacement you can up the compression ratio to 12:1 for more power & torque and hone the liners installed the block using a modern deck plate honing methods for better piston and ring fit which helps with oil control. Aftermarket pistons also allow you to go with longer rods with the advantages a higher rod length ratio brings.
Phil,i understand the pros & cons but as we all know stock short blocks could run to 200k miles

Question still remains is the stock motor blown/broke?
If not,it's a waste to spend money for a 368, not worth the dollar to HP
Do a good top end,raise compression use Jerry's head gaskets a whole lot cheaper then doing a complete 368.
I don't think $12k-$15k is worth the extra 20hp
Basicly the pros & cons of spending this kind of money for an extra 20hp.

"It's all dollars and no sense"
Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5
11.09 @ 129.27
11.04 @ 128.86
474RWHP 400RWTQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY
https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012   #79
Polo-1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 952
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post

"It's all dollars and no sense"
Pete
true dat brother
Polo-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #80
RICKYRJ1
 
RICKYRJ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tinton Falls, NJ
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: 368...should I, could I, would I

Quote:
Originally Posted by XfireZ51 View Post
Polo,

I'm making 435rwhp w my stock bottom 350, GVD ported heads(small ports), and Pete's intake cams. Marc is claiming 510chp w just his ported top end and heads, stock cams. One question is whether Hib needs to pass emissions w his LT-5?

I'm making 508 chp with a M. Haibeck 500hp package.
RICKYRJ1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2025