ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2012   #11
alnukem
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Freedom, PA
Posts: 275
Default Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????

Actually, I currently live in a county that does require emmissions, but, only if you drive a car more than 5,000 miles in a year. But, I will be transfering my residencey to Ohio on Jan 1. They have no emississions tests.
alnukem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012   #12
alnukem
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Freedom, PA
Posts: 275
Default Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????

I will do wires while I'm there.

Coil Packs

....Is there a good test?
....Good quality Replacements?
....Aroundabout Cost?

Thanks all to have responded. No one around here knows anything about these!!!!!
alnukem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012   #13
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
Default Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by efnfast View Post
I'm not the expert, but I'll chime in first.
The 1990 injectors will not tolerate the ethanol in fuel these days, that being said, do not buy GM injectors. Popular choice seems to be Fuel Injector Connection. Popular seems to be the SS, new. As opposed to rebuilt.
I have not done mine yet, maybe this winter. F.I.C. is where I'll shop.

Secondaries.
Some members have had some major engine issuses when the secondaries fall apart and you injest parts. This don't sound good to me.
Rumor has it, if you remove them, you'll loose a couple mpg.

Steve
Properly tuned in closed loop, (read: oxygen sensors engaged), mpg could actually improve.

That said, benefits far outweigh keepin' 'em, IMO!
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012   #14
tpr60
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 159
Default Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????

Just wondering has anyone removed the secondaries and passed California emission test??
tpr60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012   #15
sammy
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lone Pine, CA
Posts: 580
Default Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????

yes . i did the labor for a guy in porterville . we removed the secondaries and used marks reprogrammed prom and it passed . he sold the car since then and told the buyer passed also.
sammy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012   #16
scottfab
 
scottfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland Oregon metro area (Washington side)
Posts: 3,193
Default Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????

I empty the ash tray when it gets full of paper etc.
I could just toss it but what he heck.
Things that break on the car I just fix.
When it comes to the secondaries it's the same.
I fixed them in 99 and they worked fine until this year.
I rebuilt the air pump and I'm good to go for another decade.

One big reason I leave the secondaries in is to be able to remove
the power key any time i let someone drive it.
And it's a good conversation point.

Other systems that get pull that I choose not to are:
1. tire sensors
2. air bag
3. Cats
4. Bose system
5. FX system
__________________
Scott


Vett owner since 1979._It's about the car and the people
scottfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2025