NW region ?

[1990 415]

Originally Posted by Aurora40

What assumption did I make? And can you please clarify how an intent to pay the money back matters? That makes stealing OK in your book?

It is funny that you think your close relationship to Jeff makes you more impartial. Maybe people should be tried by their good friends, that way their intent can be accurately taken into account.

Your slander of calling it stealing is an assumption. You have no impartiality, or else you wouldn't call Jeff an embezzler. You are forming conclusions from a minority of the pertinent information. I have no formed conclusions, just facts (that must really bother you).

[Aurora40]

Originally Posted by 1990 415

Your slander of calling it stealing is an assumption. You have no impartiality, or else you wouldn't call Jeff an embezzler. You are forming conclusions from a minority of the pertinent information. I have no formed conclusions, just facts (that must really bother you).

I notice you only addressed the trivial stuff. Taking money that is not yours is OK, if there is an intent to pay it back? Yes or no.

[1990 415]

Originally Posted by Aurora40

I notice you only addressed the trivial stuff. Taking money that is not yours is OK, if there is an intent to pay it back? Yes or no.

I addressed you and your slander. If you consider that and yourself trivial, well that is your issue. If you actually knew ALL the pertinent information about the Jeff issue, you wouldn't continue to make your erroneous conjectures. I am through with trying to demonstrate to you that you only have part of the information. I prefer to deal with facts and not suppositions.

[Aurora40]

Originally Posted by 1990 415

I addressed you and your slander. If you consider that and yourself trivial, well that is your issue. If you actually knew ALL the pertinent information about the Jeff issue, you wouldn't continue to make your erroneous conjectures. I am through with trying to demonstrate to you that you only have part of the information. I prefer to deal with facts and not suppositions.

One, it's not slander if it's true. I've posted the facts that point to my accusation. Where are yours?

Two, you have twice now ignored the question I asked you and instead focused on personal insults. Is that what you consider dealing with facts?

I have a tip for you. If you want to demonstrate that I have only part of the information, present a piece of information that I do not have. That's all it will take, and should be quite easy for you. You can even throw a couple insults in with it.