![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spring Grove ,Pa.
Posts: 256
|
![]()
I have been looking at post in the CAC , LT4, LS1,ZR1 the C6 to C4's . If all these other engines are as good or better than the LT5 why doesn't GM go after the record that they set with the LT5 and regain it . They have the tools with the new ZR1 or do they just not care or just a bunch of tight wads.
__________________
91 Turquoise Metallic Haibeck 525 #0134 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 36
|
![]()
im not sure i understand your post, modular motors are alot more expensive than pushrod motors as far as production goes. GM wants to make money on the vettes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
To much to lose, not enough to gain.
And no money. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,624
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson 90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 36
|
![]()
Oh sorry, misunderstood. Are we talking lemans records and such?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,624
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson 90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 36
|
![]()
Gotcha, seems i need to dig back into my ZR-1 knowledge a bit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spring Grove ,Pa.
Posts: 256
|
![]()
That's what I ment the ZR1 was and is a very durable engine,or platform. Yes costly but durable. So if durability is not a problem then why not go for the record. I wouldn't buy a car that can't stay together no matter how fast. I would just build a car you tear down at the end of a season of racing. Isn't that why we bought a ZR1.
__________________
91 Turquoise Metallic Haibeck 525 #0134 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alex VA
Posts: 1,080
|
![]()
a couple of simple reasons, the FIA is for bragging rights and really doesn't do that much for advertising. GM is in biz to make money. the high end stuff sells like crazy without a single dime spent on ads.
keep in mind EDS kicked in the $$ back when the original record was set, and there was an l98 car too. GM did spend the big bucks on dyno and 24 hour testing at tracks like VIR that was $$ better spent than the FIA which doesn't give the same eval data they were after dyno and track testing the "ring" seems to be all the rage today, so GM spends their money there don't underestimate the $$ needed to break the record, it's more than you might think, ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|