![]() |
#111 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 875
|
![]() Quote:
I work for an aviation engine manufacturer. Our certificated engines are required to make advertised HP. However non-certificated engines are not held to the same standards by the FAA. Ours are all listed with actual HP but other manufacturers skew their numbers by as much as 2-5%. I'm not sure there is a legal requirement that exists for automotive applications in the 1990-1995 timeframe that they would have been in violation of had the dyno numbers showed a lesser number than advertised. While "false advertising" has no statute of limitations, the laches doctrine would probably get any litigation thrown out immediately. Car manufacturers globally lied about horsepower ratings for decades to skirt insurance companies which has way larger legal ramifications. I'm just not sure the "legal" claim holds much weight 26 years later. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
|
![]()
BTW, aren?t we talking about a different GM, not gm? The corporate entity involved w the LT5 no longer exists. Hasn?t since 2009. And altho the NCM retains conservatorship of the logs, it is no way a subsidiary of Generous Mothers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,619
|
![]()
Twelve years.
It's OK to let things go. We tried, but perhaps it is time to let it be. Unlike the window sticker and build sheet that provide a wealth of information, the dyno sheet would simply show what a brand new engine could do. So what if it said 401 or 409, would it make us love our cars more or less? Likely not. Some gallant efforts simply come up short. Just ask Joe. ![]() Marty |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|