![]() |
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 48
|
![]()
When it comes to condition in buying a car I use Hagerty's Condition Codes. Hagerty uses 4 condition codes: 1, 2, 3, 4. 1 is concours and 4 is fair.
http://www.hagerty.com/valuationtools/HVT/VehicleSearch Example: Condition #1 vehicles are the best in the world. The visual image is of the best car, in the right colors, driving onto the lawn at the finest concours. Perfectly clean, the car has been groomed down to the tire treads. Painted and chromed surfaces are mirror-like. Dust and dirt are banned, and materials used are correct and superbly fitted. The one word description for #1 cars is "concours." Condition#2 cars could win a local or regional show. They can be former #1 cars that have been driven or have aged. Seasoned observers will have to look closely for flaws, but will be able to find some not seen by the general public. The paint, chrome, glass and interior will all appear as excellent. No excessive smoke will be seen on startup, no unusual noises will emanate from the engine compartment. The vehicle will drive as a new car of its era would. The one word description for #2 cars is "excellent." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 857
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 48
|
![]()
You are correct Chris. Very few cars meet CC 1. If you ever listen to the show "What's My Car Worth" by Keith Martin, he rarely gives a car a CC 1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring TX
Posts: 1,341
|
![]()
i think a car could be perfect for me, and still have a flaw.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jupiter, Fl.
Posts: 813
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,574
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,271
|
![]() Quote:
verb
I think that all of the responses in this thread could conceivably be correct. It's a matter of perspective as "perfection" can be viewed both quantitatively and qualitatively Perhaps perfection is in the "Eye of the Beholder"? I'm not saying I'm correct, just expanding on some themes in this thread. I find linguistics, semantics and pragmatics interesting. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: McHenry, Il.
Posts: 6,584
|
![]() ![]() I WONDER IF MEN AND WOMEN HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW OF THE PERFECT VETTE? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 857
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 857
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|