![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 120
|
![]()
I'm out at SEMA looking at the 6.2 liter LT5 in the ZR1 C7? I didn't know they offered the LT5 in a C7? You can buy it as a crate package with ECM for $20,000 on up. I didn't realize they called this overhead valve engine a LT5 ? it's supercharged it does have 16 injectors with direct injected keep in mind. 755 horsepower is pretty impressive. I'm mildly offended they're calling it the LT5.IMAG1588.jpegIMAG1589.jpegIMAG1590.jpegScreenshot_20181101-225744.jpeg
Sent from my 2PS64 using ZR-1 Net Registry mobile app |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mystic CT
Posts: 2,625
|
![]()
Wonder if it would fit in a C4/ZR-1
w/o a whole lot of backyard engineering? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
|
![]()
The rest of us are pissed they defiled the LT5 name w an OHV, in block cam motor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 397
|
![]()
Why on earth does GM insist on reusing engine codes? What is the purpose of a code identifying an engine, if it's not unique to the particular engine?
__________________
- '90 ZR-1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 1,133
|
![]()
Remember the ZL1 engine Corvette of which only 2 were produced. Now they have the ZL1 engined Camaro.
Remember the ZR-1 Corvette from the early 70’s. Now you have our C4 ZR-1 cars. All marketing hype. Sent from my iPhone using ZR-1 Net Registry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 397
|
![]()
Zr-1 is a flagship model, like an M5 vs 540i or CL65 AMG vs CL600. Makes no sense to not continue using the brand name. None of them do however re-use motor codes. They might re-use a letter, like BMWs letter S in M-cars (S62B50 for example), but not an entire code.
__________________
- '90 ZR-1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,537
|
![]()
Doesn't make sense to me. Doesn't the code identify the engine?? Not any more.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 120
|
![]()
So I had lunch at SEMA today with a engineer from the NEW LT5 development branch and he said "it's marketing it's all about the marketing." He's had many bench racing Round Table meetings going back to 2015 involving long conversation with the GM brass about the dilution of the market with the use of the ZR1 and LT5 logos as he called it. He informed me they spend millions of dollars on Market Research, product Association and population Dynamics studies. That this is good for all parties because of the history of the LT5 success and performance which is a testament to our cars and we should hold on to them..... I thanked him for lunch and his time then I ended it with "I'm not buying what you're selling and it's a good sales pitch for an engineer but unless your NEW LT5 is a DOHC motor it's not a LT5." He nodded with acknowledgement smiled shook my hand and thanked me for my input..... I know it's not going to make a bit of difference but I felt it needed to be said.
Sent from my 2PS64 using ZR-1 Net Registry mobile app |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spring Grove ,Pa.
Posts: 256
|
![]()
I'm surprised they haven't used L88 yet. But GM can't help but reuse what they figure the public can identify with from the past. Why not? Hell the Chrysler Hemi isn't a true Hemi like the original. They sold the LS6 as a crate engine for many years. Then in 92 you had the LT1 come back. The Trans Am still used the WS6 package and Ram Air returned. It's kind of like when Hollywood does a remake of an old movie. Hey it sold before lets do a remake of this or that. Since I'm not up on Ford do they reuse designations like GM? Do they have a Cobra Jet or Super Cobra Jet?
__________________
91 Turquoise Metallic Haibeck 525 #0134 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|