|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,786
|
![]()
I'm considering splitting the difference between long tube headers and the highly compromised early manifolds. This will help me get through the emissions check and hopefully be worth a little extra pop over the early pipe set.
Do the later pipes bolt up to the cat back exactly the same or are the a different length? Even worth it? I'll be keeping the headers on the back burner for a bit either way, but it would be nice to have the car quiet for a little while. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 48
|
![]()
I've got my 95 up in the air right now. Will be more than willing to take any pictures or measurements for you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]() Quote:
Put the late manifolds on an early engine and you loose not gain power. Be happy with your early "header cats".
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,786
|
![]()
I see, the 2 cylinders get cut short on the primary length as the merge into the bigger tube.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 898
|
![]()
The 93-95 manifolds were changed to eliminate a reversion problem which, if the engine was in decel and any cat substrate was loose in the space ahead of the cats, it would get sucked into a cylinder though an open exhaust valve and damage the engine.
Unfortunately, that cost 5-hp but they gained 35 from the changes made elsewhere in the engine so the net was 30-hp.
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|