![]() |
#31 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 3,732
|
![]() Quote:
Done correctly, secondary removal and Heibeck chip to run both injectors are worthwhile modification. In your situation, with OEM injectors, I'll bet your injectors are failing. I've seen enough ZR-1s with OEM injector failures. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]() Quote:
I don't have any bog. Just sayin. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alex VA
Posts: 1,080
|
![]()
I have no issues with the secondaries gone other than the simplified maint and increased performance
it's not a good idea for passing emissions but the lt5 don't need no stinkin secondaries IMHO and marcs cal is spot on with this mod don't expect too much in terms of additional hp unless you really open up the ports in the head to take advantage of the intake porting even without the additional porting, I like the sharper throttle response, increased mid range torq (about 8 fts on the lt5) and likely about 5 hp up top the flappers are only a few cfm in restriction but they really are better off gone and passed on to someone who wants to keep the car stock very happy I did this mod with Marc. get rid of the air pump too and lighten up the car "parts left out don't break" it's not a hack, it's a really nice mod |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,271
|
![]()
I don't think anyone would see any negatives with a good ECM recalibration, such as a Haibeck chip.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 363
|
![]()
I was quoting someone else to say that my secondaries are not deleted and it does bog occasionally
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]() Quote:
And, with regard to deleting the secondaries, in many cases, it is often in conjunction with some amount of porting; porting which alters the AF requirements a bit which may well "poke the bear" a bit. So, IMO it would be a mistake at this time to make attempt to codify a connection between the secondary port throttle (SPT) elimination OR Marc' calibrations exclusively (others do both as well). Juuuust sayin. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 363
|
![]()
Ok, so i was replying to Bennie C on Page 2 quoting him that all these issues were from deleted sec, and chip. I stated that mine does that and i have neither. So i dont believe that is an issue. My 91 is stock, i believe i have an injector and/or pump issue. Waiting til Spring to do a tuneup.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|