ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 General Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2012   #21
kcl98
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Workman View Post
For easier viewing...

IMMMMMMMpressive!!

Excluding inertia and drivetrain losses, that would put it comfortably north of 660 hp at the crank...an enviable figure for any NA, street driven Corvette!

I couldn't help but notice, there is quite a bump in torque between the two runs - or so it seems ( a little hard to see the graph), resulting in a pretty good lift in HP across the spectrum. Can you shed some light on what made the difference in the runs? Were they done on the same day, or is one an overlay from a previous test?

P.
Paul - Al is correct - the difference in the two runs is simply cool down time - amazing. Also a testament to how vulnerable the cars are to heat soak - at least the big inch ones. I think this helps explain why the car was able to "pop" a 10.44 @ 133 after running a pair of 10.5-10.6 @ 131.5 - the cool down really does matter that much - and these dyno results prove it.

Kev
kcl98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012   #22
kcl98
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Quote:
Originally Posted by LGAFF View Post
705-710 Crank?
Yes - could be anywhere between 650 and 710 depending on whether you believe that a given drive train costs you a fixed amount of horsepower, regardless of how much the motor makes, or if you believe the drive train is a percentage loss, where motors with more power lose more between the crank and the wheels. If you use 20% loss for an automatic - it comes out at 710 - which makes me very happy... Not sure if I believe it, but I'm not going to take the motor out and engine dyno it to burst my own bubble.
kcl98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012   #23
kcl98
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy View Post
if i can ask what is the total timing on the car,also what airfuel did you shoot for . graph looks good ,like there were no knock events .
I was aiming for 12.5-13.0 AFRs - looks like we got them. I'm not super aggressive on timing. I think I'm either 27 or 28 all in at the higher rpm ranges. I changed it back in the fall by 1 degree, so I'd have to double check. I backed it off to 23ish or so near the torque peak, considering it's a stroker. It's possible we might get a smidge more power by adjusting the timing a little bit. Could try to get slightly more aggressive.

KC
kcl98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012   #24
kcl98
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Thanks Frank.
kcl98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012   #25
ZRapid-1
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bethany, CT
Posts: 119
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Very, very impressive.

Increase in displacement = 441 – 350 = 91 cubic inches
Crank Horsepower = 568/0.80 = 710 max. HP
Increase in horsepower = 710 - 405 =305 HP

That’s an increase in displacement of ((441-350)/350) of 26% and an increase in horsepower of ((710-405)/405) of 75%.

Would have been pretty good to get a horsepower increase in percentage equal to the displacement increase in percentage.

Give your engine builder a nice bonus!
ZRapid-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012   #26
kcl98
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

It's all in the 60ft - thanks to the automatic. There are a number of big inch motors that can run with or beat mine on the top end, but I don't think anyone is getting sub 1.5 60 ft times at the track. I think a Lingenfelter 415 went 10.40 @ 135 once, but I think it also had front runners on it. I'm hoping to get a 10.30 or better next year. Considering the Density Altitude was +350 feet when I ran the 10.44, I think it's doable under the right weather and track conditions. Thanks. Kevin
kcl98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012   #27
kcl98
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Yes true - although I also have a friend with a stock displacement 350 who makes 474 @ the tire (about 570-580 @ crank) for an increase of 43% more power over stock with no displacement increase. His top end and mine are essentially carbon copies, with a couple of exceptions, so I know a bunch of my power is coming from the top end - cams, heads, etc. Thanks.
kcl98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012   #28
sammy
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: back in lone pine
Posts: 591
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

thanx for the info. i think its allways safer to err on the conservative where tuning is concerned
sammy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012   #29
Polo-1
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 955
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcl98 View Post
Yes true - although I also have a friend with a stock displacement 350 who makes 474 @ the tire (about 570-580 @ crank) for an increase of 43% more power over stock with no displacement increase. His top end and mine are essentially carbon copies, with a couple of exceptions, so I know a bunch of my power is coming from the top end - cams, heads, etc. Thanks.
My stock 94 (headers,corsa) made over 500 rwtq. with help from a blue bottle
Polo-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012   #30
LGAFF
 
LGAFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,194
Default Re: 441 cid dyno results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polo-1 View Post
My stock 94 (headers,corsa) made over 500 rwtq. with help from a blue bottle
Blue Botttle........Viagra?
__________________
LGAFF
90 #966-150K miles-sold
92 #234-sold
1987 Callaway TT #17
1991 ZR-1 #1359
LGAFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020