ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 General Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2008   #11
LGAFF
 
LGAFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
Default Re: Byron Today

Pete,

When you say 118-120...is that one Drag radials or Street tires?


LGAFF
92 ZR1
#234
LGAFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008   #12
jonszr1
 
jonszr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
Default Re: Byron Today

pete , so you are running the stk fueling.? after porting myinj housings and plenum, my air fuel on the dyno went to 13.9 to 1. how do you combat the lean condition/ my car detonated like crazy on the first dyno run. which was why corey took 2 deg of timming out over 4500 and added fuel to get the air fuel down to 12.8-12-9 to 1.
jonszr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008   #13
jonszr1
 
jonszr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
Default Re: Byron Today

paul , my modds are as follows , jeal headers ,fidanza flywheel, corey henderson ported inj housings and plenum, as well as prom tune , 410 gears, z industries reverse air cleaner,flowmaster exhaust .car trapped 117.5 best with this set up , them had spin tec custom do a exhaust for me and it now trapps 118.5-120
jonszr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008   #14
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
Default Re: Byron Today

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
Paul,with a good ported top end (plenum & IH's) headers and good flowing exhaust our Z's run 118-120 MPH.
Even with ported heads and stock cams i would not mess with the feul tables.

Pete
Interesting. You are a Z guru, so I weigh your words heavily. However, being our Zs use derived AF (via MAP sensor) vs. a direct reading visa vis MAF sensors, the ECMs don't know exactly what the change in air flow is after porting, etc. It still determines it by indirect method; calculates air volume based on the MAP, temp, etc, etc and then refers to the on-board tables. So, if a particular LT5 (mine) was on the edge of lean w/o the added air provided by porting, etc, then the additional flow could be trouble...or at least I'm concerned (in my case - see AF graph from recent dyno run (below)).



Soooo..... Among other things, I would like to veer away from that 14.0:1 A/F ratio before doing the top end and headers. After looking at the graph, what thoughts come to mind?

P.

Last edited by Paul Workman; 10-19-2008 at 10:53 PM.
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008   #15
-=Jeff=-
 
-=Jeff=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 7,156
Default Re: Byron Today

I have a comment..

on that dyno run where was the Wideband O2 placed? I will assume tail pipe, if that is the case, don't you also have Cats? I am pretty sure the Wideband may not be as accurate as you think after the exhaust goes through the cats..
__________________
1990 Corvette ZR-1 #1051
Watson Headers (2" Primary) - Flowmaster Cats - Borla Catback
Late Model IH - Plenum
Coilovers - 4.10s
Shelby Series 1 - Wilwood Brakes
Custom Interior
NCM Lifetime Member #978
-=Jeff=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008   #16
jonszr1
 
jonszr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
Default Re: Byron Today

Quote:
Originally Posted by LGAFF View Post
Pete,

When you say 118-120...is that one Drag radials or Street tires?


LGAFF
92 ZR1
#234
mine was done on et street drag radials run at 22 lbs .
jonszr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008   #17
jonszr1
 
jonszr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
Default Re: Byron Today

videos on u tube that show some of the actual runs are under bradley taylors zr1 at famoso
jonszr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008   #18
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
Default Re: Byron Today

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
...Even with ported heads and stock cams i would not mess with the feul tables.

Pete


I found the need to modify both the VE and SA tables.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008   #19
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
Default Re: Byron Today

Originally Posted by Pete
Paul,with a good ported top end (plenum & IH's) headers and good flowing exhaust our Z's run 118-120 MPH.
Even with ported heads and stock cams i would not mess with the feul tables.

Pete
Quote:
Originally Posted by XfireZ51 View Post


I found the need to modify both the VE and SA tables.
Quote:
Originally Posted by -=Jeff=- View Post
I have a comment..

on that dyno run where was the Wideband O2 placed? I will assume tail pipe, if that is the case, don't you also have Cats? I am pretty sure the Wideband may not be as accurate as you think after the exhaust goes through the cats..
Jeff,

That along with the plug cuts I did led me to believe that even tho my dyno run showed a 12.8-.9 AFR at WOT, I decided to try "leaning" out the A/F at the top. The way to check AFR is to have the WB located at the collector and prior to the cats.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008   #20
Pete
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
Default Re: Byron Today

Paul,definately something wrong there,i would put the WB before the CATS and take it from there,also the some dyno WB's could be way off.
Most all stock LT5's get a little fat around peak torque and leanout at the top but your #'s are way off.
I would try another dyno or WB.

Recently i dyno'd with tailpipe WB and collector WB between both WB's there was .5-.7 differance at the collector it was showing me
12.3-12.8 at the tailpipe it was showing higher 12.8-13.5
Now which one do i believe?
I chose a happy medium.
I played with AFR's and to my suprise anywhere between 12.5-13.2 i did not see any gains, believe me i tried.
I like to be a little fat 12.5 at around peak torque a bit leaner 13.1 at the top.

I will have to dig up some of my old dyno sheets.

I was running 118-120MPH on GS-C's (ported intake,headers,old B&B) but would need a clutch after a day at the track.
I notice if you get good traction MPH goes up.

If you guys are going to the track with street radials and are looking to run consistent ET's/MPH you'll be pulling your hair out.

I know of a 350ci ported everything,headers good flowing exhaust,stock cams making good power with stock VE tables running 122-123 MPH in circles of course on DR's.

I bet if you guys put DR's on your cars they will run more consistent and good MPH.

If i get the time i would love to take on project ZR-1 start from scratch i.e. Jeffs ZR-1 from stock to headers/good flowing exhuast to ported intake then ported heads (stock cams).
Jeff,of course you would have to pay for dyno's gaskets/parts etc.
What do you say Jeff,that would make for a good article.


Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5
11.09 @ 129.27
11.04 @ 128.86
474RWHP 400RWTQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY
https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage

Last edited by Pete; 10-20-2008 at 03:03 AM.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2025