08-17-2014 | #11 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 1,786
|
Re: Exhaust Header "Theory" and "Practicum" Discussion
The interior drone is really bad there, Mr. K.
Outside is not bad at all, until you hammer down. But I'd still have taken it from Jeff, even if I'd heard the drone BEFORE I got it. AND, that was withOUT even knowin' how much cooler it runs (I STILL have not heard the fans come on, except when I rolled up the windows once last week, for A/C... ) In fact, I'd like to have an acoustical engineer examine and describe what's going on in this car.
__________________
I'm getting my snappics / threads removed blindly as fast as I can, to get in compliance with copyright / license TOS on the boards here (lots of FSM pages and other copyright / license violations on my part; sorry guys). And thanks to all the guys who didn't whine when I posted those FSM copyrighted / licensed stuff in my threads... ( :thumbsup: [b]and to think I complied with a mod's request to delete a pic of him in a Challenge Car in NCM Museum, so he wouldn't get in hot water)[/b] Thanks to several guys here for sending parts FREE; BearlyFlying, WeGone, Geezer, GoldCylon, and more there, TonyD, mike100, fletchusmc... 1990 #2794; 4L60e Stage V by RPM Transmission, TCI Dedicated TCM, OBX Stainless, Power Effects 3" [IMG]https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-GHpfzty7DVU/UQn-0Ru2xAI/AAAAAAAAA14/08mz1p4QLD4/s445/Screenshot-5.png[/IMG] Last edited by Schrade; 08-17-2014 at 10:33 PM. |
08-17-2014 | #12 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,632
|
Re: Exhaust Header "Theory" and "Practicum" Discussion
i've been told about the drove for years, but I hardly ever drive on the highway so i'm not worried
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson 90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B" |
09-06-2014 | #13 |
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
|
Re: Exhaust Header "Theory" and "Practicum" Discussion
Here is a video on header theory comparing primary diameter, collector extension, and ceramic coated-black painted headers.
The results are surprising, smaller primary tubing doesnt always mean better low rpm torque. Black painted vs. ceramic coating difference is also marked. Not an LT5 but the rpm range is close. I wish they had ran a stock manifold though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1bXPNy1Yn4
__________________
peace Paul ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494 |
09-07-2014 | #14 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jupiter, Fl.
Posts: 815
|
Re: Exhaust Header "Theory" and "Practicum" Discussion
Here are some things that I believe about exhaust:
The "which exhaust to use?" question is always a compromise between maximum flow, and reduction of sound, or drone. You can't have one without the other. Maximum flow is afforded by the system with the least back pressure. Reduction of sound, or drone, is enhanced by tuning the engine pulses to cancel noise. Almost always causing increased back pressure. Ultimate maximum flow would be open, equal length headers, with the length tuned to the rpm range at which your engine needs the most help. Any exhaust attached to that header collector will compromise the flow to some extent, and reduce horsepower. With the possible exception of the X pipe. Any restriction in the exhaust system will impede the flow of the whole system, ex: Crimped stock resonator inlet/outlet, (2 1/4"), reduces flow of entire system. The larger the diameter of exhaust pipes, (behind the header collector), the less back pressure, and more flow. Bigger pipes = more hp. The X pipe is the only device in the exhaust stream that can actually improve flow, by using alternating exhaust pulses to create low pressure, improving flow.
__________________
"It's about the car, not the people." 1991 ZR-1 White/Black #1236 (Owner since 1994). Stock engine with bolt-ons: Hurst shifter,"Forced Air" intake, Coplon duct, Bee Cool Radiator, Demon coils, Jeal prom, Watson headers, X pipe, 3" B&B's, Rippie flywheel, 4:10 gears, A molds, Toyo Proxes-R888's 12.06@117mph. 1.76 60ft. |
|
|