![]() |
#11 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: STL
Posts: 492
|
![]()
Neat story
![]() Is the Phase II a "hotter" engine than the production run engine? --- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nichols, FL
Posts: 611
|
![]() Quote:
Queenie and Lizzy have Phase II motors assembled by GEoff Jeal. (He currently has been made Head of driveline and engine platforms for Chrysler, drives a 500+hp 300C) Geoff insisted on using engineering sample DIS modules and injectors, it took me 2 years to finally address and solve the problems associated with my engine. It took me a week to solve and address the same problems with Lizzy. By the time I got everything ironed out the motor was trashed from fuel problems created by using prototype 80s injectors with alcohol laced fuel. It ran but I was never happy with it. In 2011 the drive train from EX5011 surfaced and I bought it. That motor and mine will be used to assemble another engine. The original engine assembled for Queenie has 1 of 3 forged cranks made for the Phase II motors and updated cam chains. One of the attractions of using the drivetrain from EX5011 is I have a known trail of the car and drivetrain. That car was used by California Street Rods to make build an early model roadster for the Oakland Show. It arrived there sans body panels but intact drive train. The drivetrain was used to mock up the engine installation as there were no production units availble. Once a production unit was made available the Phase II was removed. They destroyed the tub but kept the engine until 2011 when they brought it to Carslile to sell. Tyler |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|