ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2014   #11
Hog
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

96 LT4
330 sae net hp@5800rpm/340 lb/ft torque@4500rpm.

92-96 LT1
300 sae net hp@5000rpm and 335lb/ft torque@4000rpm.

90-92 LT5
375 sae net hp@6000rpm/370 lb/ft torque@ 4800rpm

93-95 LT5
405 sae net hp @5800rpm/385lb/ft torque@4800rpm

1997 LS1
345hp@5600rpm/350lb/ft torque@4400rpm

I see many LT4's that are dynoing between 290 and 310rwhp.
__________________
peace
Paul

ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494
Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #12
Hog
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cam View Post
Being relatively new to the GM world, is there a nice clean index somewhere that defines all the LSTPDQ27-hike designations? I pretty much know LT5, and all the swaps are LS-something-or-other, always looking to learn.
Here is a copy paste of a list I put together awhile ago.

GEN1-E
1996-99 GMT 400 trucks, 96-2000 GMT400 style SUV's,1996-2002 G vans L31 Vortec 350, L30 Vortec 305

GEN 2
1992-1996 Vettes, 1993-97 F-bodies, 1994-96 B-bodies(
Caprice) these were LT1's(B-bodies had iron heads)
1994-96 4.3L V8 rpo L99

GEN3-
1997-2004 Vette, 1998-2002 LS1-1999-2007, 2001-2004 Vette/2005 CTS-V LS6 5.7 GMT 800 trucks LR4-4.8, LM7-5.3,
L33-5.3 2005-07 4wd e-cab reg box truck
L59-5.3 2001+ flexfuel
LM4 5.3-03-04 SSR
1999-2007(99-00 iron heads) LQ4 1500HD,2500HD,3500HD trucks Sierra Denali(325hp) Sierra C3(AWD-325hp)
2002-2007 LQ9
Escalade, SS Silverado(2004+ B4V VHO 2wd ext cab truck)

GEN 4
LS2 2005-2013 Vette 2005-2007-Trailblazer SS 2006+/2006-2007 CTS-V , 2005-SSR
LS3 2008-2013 Vette-2010+ Camaro(manual trans), 2009 G8 GXP
LS4 2005-2009 FWD cars 5.3L alum block 13 mm narrower than truck 5.3's
LSA 2009+ Cadillac CTS-V/2012+ ZL1 Camaro 6.2L (SC-piston oil squirters)
LS7-2006-2013 Z06 Vette 2014+ ZL1 Camaro, LS9(SC-piston oil squirters)) 09-2013 ZR1 Vette,
L99-2010+ Camaro(auto trans VVT)
LY2 4.8=2007.5+ GMT900 trucks(with 799 heads)

5.3
2007.5+ GMT900 trucks(with 799 heads)-
LH6(alum block)LY5(iron block)
LMG(iron block-flex fuel)
6.0=
2007.5+ L76(alum block) also 2009 G8-GT LY6(iron block)
6.2-
2007.5+ L92(alum block)

GEN 5 SBC (Direct Injection)
LT1 6.2-2014+ Corvette(DI, VVT, AFM, piston oil squirters)
L83 5.3-2014+ GMC/Chevrolet truck(DI,VVT,AFM, piston oil squirters)
L86 6.2 2014+ GMC/Chevrolet truck(DI,VVT,AFM, piston oil squirters)
LT4 6.2 2015+ Chev
Corvette ZO6 SAE-certified 650hp@ 6,400 rpm/650lb/ft @ 3,600 rpm

BBC
Mark 1 "W" Series
348 Mk 1 "W" Series
348 576A 1958-61 250hp
348 573A 1958-61 280hp
348 576B 1958-61 300hp(58) 305hp(59-61)
348 573B 1958, 1961 315hp(58) 350(61)
348 577 1959-60 320hp
348 574 1959-60 335hp
348 590 1961 340hp

409 Mk 1 "W" Series
409 580 1961-62 360hp(61) 380hp(62)
409 587 1962 409hp
409 L33 1963-65 340hp
409 L31 1963-35 400hp
409 L80 1963-64 425hp
427 Z11 1963 (427 "W" Series Engine) 425hp

Mk II (Mark 2)
MK II engines were under development as a race engine, with 2 bolt mains. In Nov. 1962 NASCAR increased its max cube rule to 427. Chevrolet followed suit resulting in the Mk IIS

MK IIS (Mark 2-S) "Daytona 500 Mystery Engine"
Now with 427 cubes the "Mystery Engine" now sported 4-bolt mains, these engines were tested by JR Johnson, Bubba Farr, GC Spencer and Rex White. Johnson won teh 1st 100 mile qualifying race with an average speed 7mph OVER the current record for that race. Rutherford won the 2nd 100 mile qualifier with a record average speed of 165.183mph. Top brass at Chevrolet were calling the Chev race teams congratulating them on their success in qualifying. They didnt even knoiw thatthese engines werent the old "W" Series 409 engines. The MK-2 devolpment team was small and they had built these engines without upper managemnt approval.

MK III (Mark 3)
During the summer of 1963 Chev engineers were looking at the possibility of having a different bore center for larger displacement engines. The MK III never got off the drawing board.

Mk IV (Mark 4)
396 Mark IV(Mark 4)
L34 1966-69 360hp(66) 350hp(67-69) 4bbl.
L35 1965-69 325hp 4bbl.
L37 1965 375hp 4bbl.
L66 1969 265hp 2bbl
L78 1965-69 425hp(65) 375hp 4bbl. (66-69) 4bbl.

402 Mk IV(Mark 4)
LS-3 1970-72 330hp(70) 4bbl., 300hp(71) 4bbl., 210hp(72) 4bbl., 240hp(72) 4bbl.
L34 1970 350 hp 4bbl.
L78 1970 375hp 4bbl.

427 Mk IV(Mark 4)
L36 1966-69 385hp(66) 4bbl., 390hp(66-69) 4bbl.
L68 1967-69 400hp 3x2bbl.
L71 1967-69 435hp 3x2bbl.
L72 1966 & 1968-69 425hp 4bbl.
L-88 1967-69 (alum. heads/iron block 430hp@5200rpm rating/dyno shows 437hp@5200rpm/560hp@6200rpm with headers)
ZL-1 1969 (aluminum block/heads) 430hp 4bbl.

454 Mk IV(Mark 4)
LS-4 1970, 73-76 345hp(70), 215hp&245hp&275hp(73), 235hp&270hp(74) 4bbl., 235hp(75)4bbl., 225hp(76)4bbl.
LS-5 1970-72 360hp&390hp(70)4bbl., 365hp(71)4bbl., 230hp&270hp(72) 4bbl.
LS-6 1970-71 425hp(70) 4bbl., 425hp(71) 4bbl.
LS-7 (non-OEM) 460hp@5600rpm/490lb/ft torque@3600rpm 11.25:1 c/r

GEN V (
Generation 5)
L19 7.4 GEN V(GEN5)
1991-1993 454SS truck,
1991-1997 3/4-1 ton truck(TBI)
1991-95 454HO/502 (non-OEM)

GEN VI (Generation 6)
L29 1996-2000 3/4-1 ton trucks/SUV's
L21 7.4 1998-2001 Medium duty trucks Kodiak, P30 van, P12 cab/chassis
1996+ roller cammed (non OEM) 502 with nitrided crank, 454 same crank but non-nitrided

GEN VII (Generation 7)
L18 8.1 2000-2007 GMT800 trucks, 2000-09 Medium Duty trucks Kodiak


Thats all I could think of lol, there are more. But hast the basic jist.



For the 2008+ GEN 4 engines there are over 20 different RPO codes for the 5.3 itself-I suggest looking at the GM Media Archives for them all.

http://archives.media.gm.com/us/gm/en/index.html


Here is a good GEN 3 GEN 4 SBC resource

http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...n/viewall.html
__________________
peace
Paul

ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494

Last edited by Hog; 11-02-2014 at 07:23 AM.
Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #13
nelson007
 
nelson007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westminster, Md.
Posts: 436
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Is ther e a chart some where thats list the different engine ID's and HP? ( LS1,LT 4, ect.. Up to three years ago my newest car was a 1970 LT1. Still having problems identifying with these newer cars.
Thanks,
Nelson007

[/B]QUOTE=BigJohn;214653]Like LS6 454 and ZL1 427 Big Blocks?[/QUOTE]
__________________
WAZOO MEMBER

1993 #124 Ruby
1994 #??? Red/Black
1995 #061 Black/Red
2012 ZR1 Preproduction
nelson007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #14
Hog
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson007 View Post
Is ther e a chart some where thats list the different engine ID's and HP? ( LS1,LT 4, ect.. Up to three years ago my newest car was a 1970 LT1. Still having problems identifying with these newer cars.
Thanks,
Nelson007

[/B]QUOTE=BigJohn;214653]Like LS6 454 and ZL1 427 Big Blocks?
[/QUOTE]

read above, most of the 1997-2007 GEN 3 and 2005-current GEN 4 power/rpo codes are in the link I provided. http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...n/viewall.html

The engine rpo's this thread is about is listed in post #11.

Anything specific just ask away my friend.
__________________
peace
Paul

ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494
Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #15
nelson007
 
nelson007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westminster, Md.
Posts: 436
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Thanks Hog,
I saw that, which was of a great help. I was looking for all the engines codes from 1953. Years ago I had one but cannot find it, it was on a spread sheet.
Thanks,
Nelson007

QUOTE=Hog;214689][/QUOTE]

read above, most of the 1997-2007 GEN 3 and 2005-current GEN 4 power/rpo codes are in the link I provided. http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...n/viewall.html

The engine rpo's this thread is about is listed in post #11.

Anything specific just ask away my friend.[/QUOTE]
__________________
WAZOO MEMBER

1993 #124 Ruby
1994 #??? Red/Black
1995 #061 Black/Red
2012 ZR1 Preproduction
nelson007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #16
Hog
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson007 View Post
Thanks Hog,
I saw that, which was of a great help. I was looking for all the engines codes from 1953. Years ago I had one but cannot find it, it was on a spread sheet.
Thanks,
Nelson007

QUOTE=Hog;214689]
read above, most of the 1997-2007 GEN 3 and 2005-current GEN 4 power/rpo codes are in the link I provided. http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...n/viewall.html

The engine rpo's this thread is about is listed in post #11.

Anything specific just ask away my friend.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Sorry I dont know any of the Inline 6 rpo codes, just the 1955+ V8's.
__________________
peace
Paul

ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494
Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #17
spork2367
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 879
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike100 View Post
Definitely the new golden age of horsepower. As much as i enjoy the LTx vs LSx topics, the fact that pretty pedestrian transportation will wax pretty much anything from the 90's. I put headers on my LT5 after my friend pulled me in my own coyote powered mustang. It's a bonus now that i can walk a c5 z06 now- but the mustang race is what spurred me on.
A 2015 mustang gt does 0-60 in 4.4 seconds and the quarter in 12.8. Worst case scenario your friend is just a slightly better driver...
spork2367 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #18
Kevin
 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,632
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by spork2367 View Post
A 2015 mustang gt does 0-60 in 4.4 seconds and the quarter in 12.8. Worst case scenario your friend is just a slightly better driver...
i've seen lightly breathed on 5.0's go low 12s. Make no mistake that car is a serious contender
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson
90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B"
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #19
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,704
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
i've seen lightly breathed on 5.0's go low 12s. Make no mistake that car is a serious contender
altho at the 1/2miles, they ran out of gas. Mid 130's is what I recall.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Former Membership Chairman
Former ZR-1 Registry - BOD
1972 Corvette 4speed base Coupe SOLD long time ago
1984 Corvette Z-51/4+3 SOLD
1992 Corvette ZR-1 Aqua/Gray #474 SOLD
1992 Corvette ZR-1 Black Rose/Cognac #458
2014 Honda VFR Interceptor DX
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014   #20
mike100
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,802
Default Re: LS1 vs.LT4 vs.LT5 vs.LS6 vs.LS7 etc. discussion continued

Quote:
Originally Posted by spork2367 View Post
A 2015 mustang gt does 0-60 in 4.4 seconds and the quarter in 12.8. Worst case scenario your friend is just a slightly better driver...
the 2104's run 12.70's. the new 2015's are porkers and most people are getting 13.0's out of them.

but back to my 2012...
-it was a first gear roll race
-he drove it like he stole it because not his car, lol
-geared low
-vvt

I lost by half a car at 85 mph (not safe to keep going)- before I put headers, probably a 12.90-13.00 car at 111-112 at best (street tires). It was close and I had a long rev range, but it just did not have the power in that configuration. Over 100 mp[h would have turned my way. Definitely have more top end with the improved exhaust now. Anyways- we are talking 300 cubic inches in a car that weighs 100 lbs more- a lot of the mustang pop comes from the VVT 4 cam variable timing and the deep trans gearing. 1st gear is 3.66:1 ratio. fifth is 1:1. First gear is 13:1 ratio with 3:55 rear gears. Cheapest 12 second car I've ever owned. My friend was laughing his *** off too.

Last edited by mike100; 10-26-2014 at 11:09 PM.
mike100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020