![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Freedom, PA
Posts: 275
|
![]()
I am thinking of painting a 91 Metallic Dark Red....do you think this would look sharp or no? Just the Rear Spoiler only. Honest Opinions Please...........
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,884
|
![]() Quote:
Here's AAFC's rear: http://www.zr1.net/forum/album.php?a...pictureid=2205 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]()
A necessary evil on a full race car. But "fuggly" in just about any other application, especially for a street driven car. (Can we say "RICER"?)
JMO... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 857
|
![]()
Please, please, PLEASE...NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Freedom, PA
Posts: 275
|
![]()
The descriptions says yes, part AWF280. I would absolutely confirm that before ordering.
Last edited by alnukem; 07-06-2014 at 12:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 318
|
![]()
I'm generally not a fan of an additional wing. The ZR-1 rear bumper already has a "lip" on the upper edge that is not only form but actually functions creating downforce. That is why the ZR-1 is more stable at high speeds than many other cars. I would really need to know that the additional one works much much better, to take function over form.
![]()
__________________
2009 LS9 1990 LT-5/sold/Bought my Baby back 1994 Lingenfelter LT-5/sold 1973 LS4/sold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio area
Posts: 1,177
|
![]()
define "tacky" - If you like it, go for it.
__________________
“Buy the best example of what you want, and pay whatever it takes. That way, you cry only once.” ~ Bruce Meyer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ottawa canada
Posts: 154
|
![]()
In this case "spoiler " is just that....
Sorry but an honest opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Rockwall, Tx
Posts: 1,504
|
![]()
I'm with Paul on this. I've never seen a spoiler on any C4 that I liked. But I generally do not like spoilers. There are a few OEM exceptions, however. The Supra, F Body (Ram Air T/A), Porsche 911 Whale Tail, F40 and of course the '68 Daytona. But except for maybe the T/A these were absolute necessary extensions of these insanely fast cars. The Z has proven itself to be quite stable at any speed you choose so the function is not there. As far as the form...I've really grown to like that big a$$ but I really don't want to make it any bigger by adding more body work.
__________________
_________________ 1994 AB/Grey #141 430 RWHP/392 RWTQ FBI Lyposuction / Secondaries relieved of duty / SW Long Tube Headers / Corsa Exhaust / FIC SS Injectors / MSD Coils / Lightweight Pulleys / Corey tuned B & M Shifter / Aluminum Flywheel / Samco Hoses / Shelby Series One's / C4 No Flex Frame Stiffener BBC - Bling By Carter: Custom ZR-1 Center Caps / Custom Plenum Plate / Air Box Knobs / TB Cover / Oil Filter Cover |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Yakima Washington
Posts: 404
|
![]()
Tacky is an understatement!!!!
__________________
Jim 1990 Z # 2441 1959 c-1 230 HP 4 speed frost blue/silver 3 owner 2011 cts-v 556 HP, manual 6 speed 1955 chev 2dr ht PP 265 3 speed w/OD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|