05-08-2013 | #21 | |
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
|
Re: For the mathematicians
Quote:
I remember when Viper went from 17" rims to 18" rims and lost a marked amount of handling prowess. Rim diameters have gotten crazy and it seems the bigger is better, but not in my book. The Shelby Series 1 rims would be far better looing IMO if they were 17" rims. More rims, more sprung mass hurts many aspects of performance, although if larger brakes are utilized, some are overcome. With you being straight line biased, your shorter rim, taller sidewall tire makes huge sense in regards to contact patch. If it werent for fitting over brakes, a 15" rim/tire combo would be even better for supervised acceleration trials. So far as the height/head circumference, reaching our ankles is about average IIRC. peace Hog |
|
05-08-2013 | #22 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland Oregon metro area (Washington side)
Posts: 3,207
|
Re: For the mathematicians
Quote:
Quote:
Oh and one's height is also aprox the distance from finger tip to finger tip of outstretched arms.
__________________
Scott Vett owner since 1979._It's about the car and the people |
||
05-08-2013 | #23 |
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shalimar, FL
Posts: 192
|
Re: For the mathematicians
So, head circumference and finger widthe aside , generally speaking, 4.10 gears and bigger tire diameter would somewhat make the speedo more accurate vs only 4.10's or only larger
diameter tires. They affect the speedo oppositely (is that a word?). Cancel each other out to some extent maybe a better way to say it. Correct? |
05-08-2013 | #24 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,452
|
Re: For the mathematicians
Does this help?
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html |
|
|