08-11-2009 | #1 |
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,828
|
Hurst vs B&M
I know this debate has raged for a while, more so now that the Hurst is hard to find - but I just installed the Hurst in my Z, and I got a good deal on a used B&M Ripper, and looking at the Ripper that arrived today, it looks like it replaces the entire pivot mechanism in the shifter housing. I find it a little odd that everyone seems so biased towards the Hurst, yet there are people who seem fanatical about the B&M. I used to have a Ripper on the T56 in my Camaro, and loved it. Had a hurst in my '01 C5 and '94 C4, and those were nice too, a little more civilized I guess, though less mechanical-feeling. If anyone has 2 cents to throw in, I'm all ears.
|
08-12-2009 | #2 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,407
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M
from what i have heard you have to modify the b and m shifter to have it work correctly. it does have a shorter throw though . i like bill bs,modified hurst shifter ,works so perfect it should be a sin
|
08-12-2009 | #3 |
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 738
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M vs Bill Boudreau Modified Stock
I'm very pleased with my stock shifter modified by Bill Boudreau. It has the same feel of stock but with a very noticable shortened throw. Bill cleans up the mechanism for overall smoother operation, shortens the handle 1.3" above the fulcrum and lengthens it 3/8" below. His modification retains the factory reverse lock-out.
When you look at the Hurst and BB&M, you ought to also check out http://www.zfdoc.com/ |
08-12-2009 | #4 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Side of Chicago
Posts: 122
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M
I had a B&M shifter on my 94 convertible it was very precise and you could beat on it all day.
But on the ZR1 the shifter is just so smooth; I’m going to leave it alone and live with the longer throw.
__________________
Jim
1994 Corvette convertible Sold. 92 #178, Haibeck chip,Hawk brake's,RC injectors, B&B cat back, X-Pipe and 49th St. Rockers sold. |
08-12-2009 | #5 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring TX
Posts: 1,348
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M vs Bill Boudreau Modified Stock
Quote:
|
|
08-12-2009 | #6 | |
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,679
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M vs Bill Boudreau Modified Stock
Quote:
Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
|
08-12-2009 | #7 | |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 7,169
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M
Quote:
__________________
1990 Corvette ZR-1 #1051 Watson Headers (2" Primary) - Flowmaster Cats - Borla Catback Late Model IH - Plenum Coilovers - 4.10s Custom Interior NCM Lifetime Member #978 |
|
08-12-2009 | #8 |
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tinton Falls, NJ
Posts: 1,177
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M
I have the B&M now for the past 3 yrs (came with the car) I don't which is best but I just picked up a new Hurst at a good price. Should I even bother to switch?
|
08-15-2009 | #9 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 44
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M
I have a B&M in my 95, came with the car so i don't know how an OEM one feels. The B&M is very stiff to shift, need a lot of force to shift it. I don't know if this is normal or not but i find it get tiresome when in traffic.
If this does not sound normal, please let me know and if there is a fix or a way to make it a smoother shifter. Mike
__________________
95- #338 |
08-15-2009 | #10 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,407
|
Re: Hurst vs B&M
not normal. get ahold of bill boudreau zfdoc . he can redo yours to shift awsome
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|