![]() |
#61 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 142
|
![]() Quote:
That sounds good. Thanks for the clarification. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LaFayette, GA
Posts: 31
|
![]()
I should have wrote this sooner but I deleted the secondaries shortly after I started this thread and I am very happy with the results. I purchased a chip from Mark, removed the entire secondary system except for the sensor under the ECM and wire tied and safety wired the secondaries open. I didn't notice any difference at low speed and Marks tune has improved the idle and gave it more power. In the future I plan on getting the injector housings and plenum ported and powder coated and while I have it all apart I will remove the throttle plates. It's so good to not have to worry about a secondary vacuum leak area under the plenum is much nicer looking without the rats nest of hoses. Thank you for all the advice.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 1,657
|
![]()
What about us unfortunates who live where the dreaded SMOG Nazis prowl?
Would removing the secondaries affect emissions to the point of failing our bi-annual inspection? I would love to be able to ditch them, one less thing to go wrong. TomC "Crabs" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]() Quote:
But, this would be a question for Dom or one of the pro tuners out there. However, I'll be comfortable placing most of my "chips" on the square marked "won't affect emissions". So, what do some of the tuner experts say? ![]() P. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 142
|
![]() Quote:
FWIW, NY emission standards are high and cant be far from CA standards. My 427 with larger than stock cams passed well within the limits. Reliablity is my main concern and why Id like to eliminate as much as possible. I do bring an extra solonoid to track events just in case, but id be nice to not even need it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
|
![]() Quote:
Paul, You're on the right track. I have a WB on my car and motor idles and runs at 14.4 to 15.1. BLMs are between 124-131. With secondaries operating the pulsewidth for each set of injectors drops depending on where in the VE table you are. Essentially the aggregate pulsewidth for idle and part throttle cruise will be the same regardless if one or two injectors is (are) feeding the cylinder. I wonder if it isn't better to have both injectors operating in terms of reliability? Last edited by XfireZ51; 12-01-2009 at 08:56 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,047
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Robert ZR-1 Net Registry Oregon State Director 91 ZR-1 #431 Black/Black LPE 368 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know why Napa couldn't find them. I know the Dorman Part # is good. The only thing i can say is try a different parts store or i can send you a set as a Christmas gift,will have to wait till next week,i'm out of town. Pete
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/RNB-555-108/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,047
|
![]()
Found them at Baxter
![]()
__________________
Robert ZR-1 Net Registry Oregon State Director 91 ZR-1 #431 Black/Black LPE 368 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|