ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2010   #11
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
Default Re: intake port molds

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpepmeie View Post
Not trying to offend anyone. Yes, I paid for these heads, but I don't think it is fair to show the finer details of a professional's work, developed from his years in the trade. I am sure he would consider that his trade secrets. He earns a living that way, so I was just trying to respect that, that's all.

Todd
Truly fascinating stuff - this porting thing. And, for that reason, like Bob, I feel more than a little frustration with the holding of information. But! As you said, others have paid the dues and are entitled to the data they developed. If you or I wanna experiment w/ our own stuff and publish the results, nobody would say nay to that.

Just what size/shape is best? A wise old sage once said, "Truth is where you find it!" My point is, there is soooo much more to evaluating porting than a "static" flow bench can evaluate. I'm talking about harmonics set up by the opening and closing of the valves; the interruption and reflection of air flow - harmonics in other words - which play an important roll in "internal supercharging". My point is, what looks best on a (static) flow bench is not necessarily what is going to be best in practice. And, for most of us mortal people, the math gets sooo complicated that all we can do is get close, and then experiment and see what trends develop. The proof is in the pudding, in other words, along with what is desired from then end product.

Gotta run. "Mo later!"

P.
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez!

90 #1202
"FBI" top end ported & relieved
Cam timing by "Pete the Greek"
Sans secondaries
Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive
SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs

Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010   #12
Jagdpanzer
 
Jagdpanzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: intake port molds

Todd,
Thanks for sharing with use.
What material did you use and how did you go about making the port molds?
Jagdpanzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010   #13
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,709
Default Re: intake port molds

Todd,

Will you be posting air flow numbers when you get them? How will airflow determine or change the cam specs you land(ed) on?
XfireZ51 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010   #14
tpepmeie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 815
Default Re: intake port molds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagdpanzer View Post
Todd,
Thanks for sharing with use.
What material did you use and how did you go about making the port molds?
US Composites 74-30 liquid urethane. The stuff is dead easy to use... just make sure you mix it very thoroughly. Otherwise you end up with a port full of gelatinous goop which never hardens. ask me how I know.
tpepmeie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010   #15
tpepmeie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 815
Default Re: intake port molds

Quote:
Originally Posted by XfireZ51 View Post
Todd,

Will you be posting air flow numbers when you get them? How will airflow determine or change the cam specs you land(ed) on?
Don't have them in front of me right now. From memory...>340's CFM @ .500 lift. But, of course like others have said, we don't race flow benches!
tpepmeie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010   #16
tpepmeie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 815
Default Re: intake port molds

Here are some good SpeedTalk threads on the topic, if you are interested...

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16689

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17340

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18803

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11578

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12924

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18730

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14205

If you are so inclined, search for posts by Darin Morgan, Erland Cox, cboggs, and maxracesoftware (Larry Meaux).

Todd
tpepmeie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010   #17
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,709
Default Re: intake port molds

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpepmeie View Post
Don't have them in front of me right now. From memory...>340's CFM @ .500 lift. But, of course like others have said, we don't race flow benches!
I was curious about the low lift numbers and the I/E ratio. No question 340cfm at .5" lift is a great number. Is your cam going to be using that high a lift?
XfireZ51 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010   #18
Jagdpanzer
 
Jagdpanzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: intake port molds

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpepmeie View Post
US Composites 74-30 liquid urethane. The stuff is dead easy to use... just make sure you mix it very thoroughly. Otherwise you end up with a port full of gelatinous goop which never hardens. ask me how I know.
Does this stuff set up ridgid or stay flexable?
and how easy are the molds to extract after setting up?
Jagdpanzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2010   #19
flyin ryan
 
flyin ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
Default Re: intake port molds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagdpanzer View Post
how easy are the molds to extract after setting up?
Not hard, use a release agent.
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y.
flyin ryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010   #20
tpepmeie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 815
Default Re: intake port molds

Looks like threads from Sunday didn't come over to the new forum.

Anyway, the heads -small ports and all- flat rocked on another bench and repeated the results seen at RFD. Actually a few cfm better. Amazing results considering only .5mm oversize intake valves.

The housings.... well appear to be a dud. Lost a ton of airflow and couldn't repeat the previous numbers for some reason, not even close. More work to do for sure. It would be an absolute shame to cork up these heads with weak injector housings.

stay tuned.
tpepmeie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020