05-22-2016 | #11 | ||
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 899
|
Re: Exhaust Backpressure- 3" vs. 2 1/2"
Mr. Hog gets a Beacon of Reality Award for that spot-in statement!
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
||
05-22-2016 | #12 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,708
|
Re: Exhaust Backpressure- 3" vs. 2 1/2"
CCM is a Chassis Control Module
ECM is an Engine Control Module PCM is a Powertrain Control Module BCM is a Body Control Module
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Former Membership Chairman Former ZR-1 Registry - BOD 1972 Corvette 4speed base Coupe SOLD long time ago 1984 Corvette Z-51/4+3 SOLD 1992 Corvette ZR-1 Aqua/Gray #474 SOLD 1992 Corvette ZR-1 Black Rose/Cognac #458 2014 Honda VFR Interceptor DX |
05-22-2016 | #13 | |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jupiter, Fl.
Posts: 815
|
Re: Exhaust Backpressure- 3" vs. 2 1/2"
Quote:
Yes, they were delivered with that exhaust system. But the race cars Zora intended them for almost invariably used tube headers, and "off the road" side pipe configuration seen on factory supported L-88's. I doubt if any part of those systems measured 2 1/2", except maybe the header downtubes. A side issue- Where did they get that 430hp. figure? It's generally thought that it was pulled out of the air and put in the order form to coax the buyer into ordering the 3 carb 435hp. street version instead of the L88 race motor. But did they "rate it" by going down the dyno rpm scale until they found the number 430, and rate it at that rpm, instead of where it actually peaked? Last edited by Bob Eyres; 05-22-2016 at 05:22 PM. Reason: additional thought |
|
05-23-2016 | #14 | |
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
|
Re: Exhaust Backpressure- 3" vs. 2 1/2"
Quote:
L88 number 21550 made exactly 437hp@5200rpm and 560hp@6400rpm on 115 octane fuel running tube headers. We have to remember that a vast majority of the populous had never heard of a ZL1. There were only 20 1967 L88s sold. L88 cars also had a laundry list of L88 only(and the following L88 delete) options that helped destine them for race use only. In Chevrolet sales brochures, in 1969 the engine was listed as a Special High Performance Engine (Off road Application Only Only) In order to order the L-88, mandatory optional equipment included: L-88 engine $947.90 J50 vacuum bower booster $42.50 J56 heavy duty 4 wheel disc brakes $42.15$342.30 M22 (rockcrusher 4 speed manual trans $237.00 K66 transistorized ignition $73.75 F41 suspension $36.90 G81 Positraction rear axle $42.15 C48 heater/ defrost delete package credit of $97.85 L88 delete Further efforts by Chevrolet to ensure its use as a race car, as well as being lighter the following were not available once the L-88 box is checked: -radio -power windows -air conditions -power steering
__________________
peace Paul ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494 |
|
05-23-2016 | #15 | |
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
|
Re: Exhaust Backpressure- 3" vs. 2 1/2"
Quote:
Some of these engine were sent to the Chevrolet Engine Center in Warren Michigan where Bill Howell was a development engineer and Tom Langdon(who was a dyno tech) took over for Mr Howell in 1966. Mr Langdon told the story stock Camaro exhaust being fitted onto a ZL1 during ZL1/Camaro development and cutting its power down considerably, "We did run some checks to see what the performance penalty was. A good ZL-1 when equipped with a standard set of aftermarket headers, would produce somewhere in excess of 500hp, maybe 525hp, without any attention to detail whatsoever. In other words, taking the engine, putting it on the dyno, putting on exhaust headers, and making it run, you wound up with around 525hp, perhaps 600hp with some attention to detail with the cylinder heads, etc, etc. We took one of those engines and and ran it with the released Camaro exhaust system and got exactly half the power with the Camaro exhaust manifolds, exhaust system, manifolds and pipes. So you can see how sensitive the power was to the exhaust system when used with that ZL-1 racing camshaft. Power was cut to something like 275hp." Tom Langdon The ZL1/Camaro dyno testing was done in Warren Michigan, not Tonawanda. It was other ZL1 dyno testing being done at Tonawanda. I can neiher confirm nor deny your assertion that there wasn't a dyno cell large enough to accommodate an entire Camaro exhaust and engine dyno at Tonawanda.
__________________
peace Paul ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|