![]() |
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]() Quote:
Again, the issue is direct vs. indirect "testing". Direct testing on the 1G LT5 is cost prohibitive, especially considering the lack of new or substitute parts. And, it takes significant runtime/stress testing to gather evidence enough to make any scientific, definitive conclusion(s). So, in absents of direct testing, we're relegated/obliged to accept INDIRECT test data results gathered with other (engines) operating with identical or at least practically close conditions. My point is, the data for making a direct comparison(s) and much less predictions between results of this latest (Mobil 1) oil and that of products having considerably more real runtime data on actual 1G LT5s rests solely on a manufacture's reputation and little if anything else - comparatively speaking. EXAMPLE: Various antifreeze makers provided a revolutionary coolant (referred to commonly as DEXCOOL; a coolant improvement over the traditional (GREEN) silicon base coolant which "Dex" superseded. But, if one were to replace their GREEN stuff with DEXCOOL solely on the assumption that the "DEX" was made by a reputable company and therefore suitable for their LT5, they were in for a very expensive mistake. Companies like Mobil 1 make a variety of products for various applications. But, applications differ, and one size does not always fit all!Your mileage may vary.... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|