ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-22-2021   #1
secondchance
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 3,713
Default 2 ohm speakers - trial

I found availability of aftermarket 6.5" (rear) and 3.5" 2 ohm speakers. And, naturally, had to see if replacement resulted in better performance.
So, I ordered a pair of PowerBass OE652 (2 ohm) and JBL GX328 (2.3 ohm).
https://powerbassusa.com/us/en/produ...65-full-range/
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/jbl-gx-...?skuId=6283624

6.5s arrived first. So, removed passenger side, rear speaker assembly and replaced OEM speaker with PowerBass unit. No modification was necessary and new unit dropped right in.

I turned off my sub, adjusted fader to rear only and used balance to compare OEM vs. replacement. End result - 27 year old OEM Bose sounded louder and better reproduced mid-range and low - much richer sound compared to replacement unit.

I thorized speaker enclosure voluum and port tuning optimized for Bose unit are responsible for higher quality of sound especially at low frequency range.

I have not yet tried front speaker yet. Maybe, I won't even waste time trying it out. Namely, since fronts with 3.5" is challenging even more for the fronts and careful design in volume and tuned port done by Bose most likely cannot be beat.

It was worth trying but in the end, my assumption 10 years ago, despite all negative sentiments over OEM system, within the restraint of space for good size speakers (especially up front), careful tuning of Bose is tough to beat.

I remember Chevrolet/Bose marketing of new for 84 Bose system later enhanced and labeled as Bose Gold, with EQ being optimized for Corvette interior and all that. Maybe be this is true. What I know for certain after this trial is by carefully designing air volume behind the speaker and tuned port, Bose successfully optimized sound level and successfully increased low frequency production despite relatively tiny/small speakers. However, in my opinion, what is lacking, especially if you opted for exhaust headers and straight though exhaust, is sound volume. Best way to counter this is 1997 to 2002 Cadillac Bose 100W amplifiers. C5 Corvette Bose amps are also 100W but has more wires/pins at the connector and may require sorting out wiring at the connector. Cadillac Bose amps have same pins and are direct plug in substitution. I am running Cadillac 100W amps front and rear for about a year and have not noticed any ill effect. What it did was increase the volume level. I believe higher wattage amp running at lower volume (compared to lower wattage at higher volume) reduces distortion.

One additional mod to OEM speakers were Elmer's glue diluted with equal part water and 2-3 coats of mixture. This added additional stiffness to OEM paper cones resulting in more tight sound. Just be sure to dry the speaker thoroughly before turning them on.

In summary, we have viable substitute speakers if and when we blow Bose speakers and cannot find clean/low mile replacement. However, hold on to your OEM speakers (perhaps strengthened with Elmer's glue - homemade composite) and avoid unnecessary expenditure like I did.

Lastly, if not committed to keeping completely stock, subwoofer/subwoofers addition definitely adds richness especially when playing more recent vintage recordings with low frequency deep bass.
https://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread.php?t=26010

Last edited by secondchance; 03-22-2021 at 06:48 PM.
secondchance is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020