![]() |
#14 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,491
|
![]()
[QUOTE=32valvZ;302776]
Quote:
I don't have a Dyno graph of my motor with only top end* porting. I wish I did**. Instead, I have to derive an estimate of rwhp by subtracting the known gain achieved by others after the heads too were ported (that being between 25-35 rwhp) to approximate what my top end only porting was. The Dyno graphs show the before (stock) peak starting point, and peak after that establishes the full porting (and cam phasing) improvement - the bulk of improvements up to that time: starting at 336 avg rwhp and ending with 432 rwhp with HEAD porting included. So, est. of "400" rwhp before porting the heads is reasonably accurate, in my estimation. Dyno graphs and HP numbers and estimates are popular for most - salesmen especially. But, where rubber meets the road means more to me than HP bragging rights, and actual force at the wheels, i.e., TORQUE over the entire rpm range, or POWER UNDER THE CURVE gives a better indication of the worth of any modifications - to me, anyway. *TOP END included the plenum and IH brought out to 36mm, and later 37.5mm
__________________
[I][COLOR="Blue"]Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez![/COLOR][/I] 90 #1202 "FBI" top end ported & relieved Cam timing by "Pete the Greek" Sans secondaries Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|