Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Workman
For easier viewing...
IMMMMMMMpressive!!
Excluding inertia and drivetrain losses, that would put it comfortably north of 660 hp at the crank...an enviable figure for any NA, street driven Corvette!
I couldn't help but notice, there is quite a bump in torque between the two runs - or so it seems ( a little hard to see the graph), resulting in a pretty good lift in HP across the spectrum. Can you shed some light on what made the difference in the runs? Were they done on the same day, or is one an overlay from a previous test?
P.
|
Paul - Al is correct - the difference in the two runs is simply cool down time - amazing. Also a testament to how vulnerable the cars are to heat soak - at least the big inch ones. I think this helps explain why the car was able to "pop" a 10.44 @ 133 after running a pair of 10.5-10.6 @ 131.5 - the cool down really does matter that much - and these dyno results prove it.
Kev