ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-21-2018   #10
spork2367
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 879
Default Re: Serious Concerns Over Parts Availability

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkreigh View Post
I'm confused why everyone wants to rip out the lt5 when it's some of the electronics that are rare. Jerry is working on the DIS and as soon as some one needs one let me know.

There were a couple tongue in cheek comments about it, but I don't think anyone is advocating ripping out LT5s...

I'll sell you mine and use the money for putting a megasquirt on it. coil on plug is WAY better than coil packs and the megasquirt offers a very affordable option to the unobtanium DIS parts. keep in mind there are 7000 of these made and they rarely fail. by the time they do Jerry is likely to have completed a solution. GM isn't going to share tech data guys, they won't even give out dyno sheets for goodness sake so that's not going to happen. And as Jerry will attest, reverse engineering is very hard work.

Even with megaquirt, COP wouldn't be a plug and play affair. Just getting the megasquirt running well with a stock engine and DIS is not for the layman. I am setting one up now on a 1991.

We don't have a lot of high mileage engines to say exactly how often they fail. They are electronic and in a high heat area. Eventually they will fail.

The GM issue has already been address in this thread. We know they are zero help.


yes, there are many parts that can be tough to get, but gents like Jerry and many talented folks step up to address that. In the age of 3d printing and modern electronics, with a bit of work, the old gal can be updated to use the new stuff. racers do it all the time and it's really not as hard as some would think.

Racers also spend 10-15k putting modern sensors and new controllers on engines. They spend money that can't be justified on weekend cars, or even daily drivers. Not only that, but they aren't worried about compatibility with other systems on the car, creature comforts, etc.

we have the technology to keep the beast alive despite the challenges as long as there is a desire and some $ to do so.

Not "some" money, lots of money. I would be curious what Jerry has invested in development work alone, let alone inventory. At some point, there won't be enough other parts to share costs with. There are parts that would be cost prohibitive for even Jerry to justify. Not saying there won't be work arounds, but then you get back to the issue of originality and collectability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog View Post
Much of anything fun comes down to money. Sometimes it takes more than average to overcome the will of some to hold onto "rare" components. I'd love to see how many SLP T-Rams are actually installed on cars compared to the number that are hid away somewhere for bragging rights alone.
I was disgusted to see Ferrari V-12 cam blanks for some disgustingly low price. The guy had hundreds of them. Different story for our LT5s, though the custom ones that are available are pure engine porn.
The majority of spare parts for these cars remain unused. But like you said, people letting go of them is a different story. It does seem to go in waves though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkreigh View Post
no doubt the factory ignition works great until it doesn't the DIS is going for stooopid money just like thermostat housings and other odds and ends
Jerry's new unit should curb that. NOS units will still bring a premium for those wanting originality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJL View Post
Are the ECMs, DIS and CDMs interchangeable between model years? That would be helpful info to have. What would happen if I plugged my 95 ECM into my 92? Or are they split between 90-93 and 93-95?
DIS swaps across all years. ECMs swap across all years as long as you swap the chip. Can't speak to the other modules.



The big picture here is this: Despite their perceived and or real reliability, as a whole, the population is only accruing miles. As that mileage increases, statistical probability dictates that parts of the system will fail. I do both statistical process control and statistical reliability engineering for the engines our company produces.

Every mechanical system fails given enough time and/or cycles. We've already seen failure modes in these engines and as the mileage goes up, the probability of failure does as well. It also goes up for many parts as a function of age alone and not necessarily use (capacitors, seals, o-rings, etc.)

There are a lot of cars that are just now breaking out of the low mileage barrier as more and more are turned from collectors into drivers. In the next 5-10 years we will see more failures than ever. That is just a mathematical fact. The only thing that would prevent that is if every single owner stopped driving them tomorrow and never drove them again.
spork2367 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020