02-11-2010 | #11 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Dakota/California
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
I am assuming you are assured full depth of the stud. Once stud is set you get full locking of the nut. One other advantage.....you are not turning the stud while applying the final torque on the nut. These ARP studs would work great for Head Bolts to obtain more even torque. Does anyone use these ARP type studs for head bolts? Last edited by Dynomite; 02-11-2010 at 11:09 AM. |
|
02-11-2010 | #12 |
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Studs are obviously the preferred method, no disputing that, right? But I didn't bother with mine, ...unless a person is going to the ΒΌ mile often with good (sticky) tires, factory bolts are fine. If you want to do it, just because, only really need to the one side. The one cap takes all the load, other side is more or less along for the ride. Also if a person does convert over to ARP studs, better be absolutly sure to have the 'New' correct TQ. spec. & what lube to use. Another thing...Don't 'Double-Nut' the stud in tight to the case...Finger tight only into the case....VERY important!!
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y. |
02-11-2010 | #13 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Dakota/California
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
Just bottom tap the hole like Jagdpanzer suggests and run the stud in with an allen head wrench snug fit.Then apply ARP Moly lube to the nut and torque it down using ARP torque recommendations. Last edited by Dynomite; 02-11-2010 at 12:20 PM. |
|
02-11-2010 | #14 |
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,661
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
I converted to studs because stock bolt holes are threaded into the aluminum housing material without the benefit of inserts and I was worried the threads were not up to taking several disassembles and re-torques for adjusting the shims several times in order to find the optimum gear contact pattern and proper backlash. In my experience in addition to being more secure the studs makes the set up process go a lot smoother and quicker as compared to using the original grade 5 bolts. Your mileage may differ.
Last edited by Jagdpanzer; 02-11-2010 at 10:06 PM. |
02-11-2010 | #15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
As for the POR-15, no rust on the aluminum but I wanted to clean it up and it did not look very good after my other attempts. POR-15 is just an excellent product that I have been using for over 20 years and it is very durable as it will seal the aluminum from corrosion or discoloration. The yokes on mine were quite rusty and why I used it on that portion. If you are a purist/NCRS type then you will want to keep it all naturalllllll........... |
|
02-11-2010 | #16 |
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
My point being don't set the stud in too tight! Double Nut/Broached top...tish-tosh . Finger tight is the way. If it doesn't go in cleanly with your fingers, run a tap or thread chaser through. Applies for all/everykind of studs.
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y. |
02-12-2010 | #17 | |||
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Dakota/California
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The sources provided by everyone (updated) for parts to install 410s are all in post #10 in this thread. I put all the 410 information in Hammer's thread herein because gas mileage is always an issue with 410s. Not much is said for the best rational for switching to 410s (sixth gear becomes usefull at speeds under 75 mph) Also, when Hammer installs his 410s I am hoping he will add pictures and suggestions here in this thread since he should now be convinced to install the 410s before BG. It will be interesting how Hammer shims and sets backlash to get that perfect contact pattern as HAWAIIZR-1 ended up with on his 410s (post #40). http://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7419&page=4 Rarely there are some issues related to over spinning the output shaft on the transmission with 410s which ZFdoc at billb@zfdoc.com has explained in detail on another forum. http://forums.*************.com/c4-z...at-find-2.html The ************* do not mean X-rated which I just do not understand the use of *********** Last edited by Dynomite; 02-12-2010 at 07:46 PM. |
|||
02-12-2010 | #18 |
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
The only time any amount of torque is acceptable on stud run in/bottoming is if the stud has a 'Bullet/Ball' end on the coarse end & the receiving hole has been machined accordingly, female round bottom on blind end, even then, TQ. should be no more than 100 'Inch' Pounds max, for anything automotive size. A lot of guys I see daily run in studs tight , they don't understand, a stud that is set tight will never center properly when the nut is TQ'ed & has 'Pull' applied. True story .
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y. |
02-12-2010 | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Dynomite,
Thanks for your comments and for always sharing your input. I just wanted to let you know that the gear pattern on mine has been questioned by few as not being ideal and the pictures don't accurately show it too. I went back to the installer to question it and the preload he designed into it. He swears by it and will stand by the install from a shop with a good reputation and great owner so I'm going to take a chance on it; I'll assemble mine this weekend and reinstall. The guy built a lot of diffs for race cars and 4 X 4s so I hope all will go well when I break in and run it. Break in will be with conventional gear oil then changed to synthetic after about 500 miles ensuring posi additive each time. When I rebuilt the posi clutch packs we assembled with posi additive from the General. As for the POR-15, I am not sure of long term effects when used on aluminum yet as this is the first time I am using it on other than steel, but I have loved it in all other uses and restorations with permanent results. I did a lot of research on it with POR-15 tech and websites with info including a guy in Australia that used it on a motorcycle engine. Therefore I am using it on my LT5 block as well as many other aluminum suspension parts too for adding detail while I rebuild everything. I just could not stand to see the ugly, old finish when redoing something. Just be sure to use the prep if so as with any finishing, preparation is the key to a good bond, etc. I used foam brushes that seemed to work for the best finish and will powdercoat the driveshaft and halfshaft in brilliant silver like my top half of motor as I did not want any brush marks on the smooth surface. Although I have a compressor and spray gun, I did not want to attempt spraying POR-15 anywhere since it really is permanent if you don't clean it ASAP. The trans will be cleaned up with Eagle One aluminum wheel etching only per recommendation of the ZF Doc. Sorry John to pollute your thread with my thoughts unrelated to your MPG question. Just trying to answer the Dynomite since he is a very detailed person. Last edited by HAWAIIZR-1; 02-12-2010 at 01:38 PM. |
02-12-2010 | #20 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Dakota/California
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
After I posted that camshaft timing details in your thread I thought.....what a smart-aleck I will appear to be...so I deleted those couple posts Actually if I use that logic, I will prolly delete a lot of my posts I doubt John (Hammer) will mind us on a tangent here And yes.......I learn from the details. Thanks for the explanations regarding 410 set up and POR-15 Cliff Last edited by Dynomite; 02-12-2010 at 01:29 PM. |
|
|
|