ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2009   #1
Kb7tif
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: S Nevada
Posts: 352
Default This fall

Watson Headers/ Straights to the borlas
Ported Plenum/ IH
New Matched Injectors.
Already Have the headers/injectors.
I know the fidanaza made a nice difference, hope this does nice as well
__________________
1995 Convertible Supercharged Auto
1974 454 550hp (avatar car) On the blocks- -Scharger install !
1992-Zr-1 Sold.
Watson Headers
Ported Plenum, Housings
Random tech cats
Fidanza Flywheel
Chipped, Relocated Mat
Woods 165 stat
Borlas, Straights
1996 Lt4 Sold
1994 Lt1 Sold
2004 Z06 Sold
AKA** Illenema
Kb7tif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009   #2
A26B
 
A26B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arcadia,OK
Posts: 3,394
Default Re: This fall

You'll like it!!
__________________
Jerry Downey
JERRYS LT5 GASKETS & PARTS
http://www.jerrysgaskets.com
1994 ZR-1, Black/Black, Lingenfelter Aerobody, 416cu in, 3.91 gears, coil-over susp, Brembo brakes, etc.
2016 Black-Red, 3LT-Z51 Auto 8-speed.
A26B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009   #3
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,708
Default Re: This fall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kb7tif View Post
Watson Headers/ Straights to the borlas
Ported Plenum/ IH
New Matched Injectors.
Already Have the headers/injectors.
I know the fidanaza made a nice difference, hope this does nice as well
Tuning is a critical element to making the package work.
I have a very similar setup including the Watson's.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009   #4
blackjack
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: north of montreal
Posts: 510
Default Re: This fall

i have a similar setup,except for ssw headers....i loooove it...no resonance
...next winter,its van deventer heads,and underdrive pulleys
bj
blackjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009   #5
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,708
Default Re: This fall

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack View Post
i have a similar setup,except for ssw headers....i loooove it...no resonance
...next winter,its van deventer heads,and underdrive pulleys
bj
BJ,

Just put on the UD pulleys and I have a set of VD heads in the garage. Based on my anecdotal evidence from 1/4 mile runs using the same track, the UD pulleys are worth about .7mph.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009   #6
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
Default Re: This fall

Quote:
Originally Posted by XfireZ51 View Post
BJ,

Just put on the UD pulleys and I have a set of VD heads in the garage. Based on my anecdotal evidence from 1/4 mile runs using the same track, the UD pulleys are worth about .7mph.
Dom, did you do your data logging from a rolling start? Otherwise, the ambiguity stemming from all the variable/interacting factors surrounding a consistent launch would obscure .7 mph, no?

P.
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez!

90 #1202
"FBI" top end ported & relieved
Cam timing by "Pete the Greek"
Sans secondaries
Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive
SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs

Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009   #7
XfireZ51
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,708
Default Re: This fall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Workman View Post
Dom, did you do your data logging from a rolling start? Otherwise, the ambiguity stemming from all the variable/interacting factors surrounding a consistent launch would obscure .7 mph, no?

P.
Paul,

I did use the word "anecdotal" for that reason. I don't consider it scientific evidence however, it does provide a data point. I drive at Byron pretty consistently and .7mph is outside the typical variance I would expect with my driving. The UDs were the only change made since the last time at the track. Weather conditions were similar and somewhat warmer than last May when
I ran the 116.1. With an additional change to the calibration, the mph went up further. I look at trap speed because of the fact that it is less susceptible to variation from factors such as launch. In this instance, my launch in the previous run was better.
XfireZ51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020