![]() |
#21 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
|
![]() Quote:
Kev |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
|
![]()
Yes - could be anywhere between 650 and 710 depending on whether you believe that a given drive train costs you a fixed amount of horsepower, regardless of how much the motor makes, or if you believe the drive train is a percentage loss, where motors with more power lose more between the crank and the wheels. If you use 20% loss for an automatic - it comes out at 710 - which makes me very happy...
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
|
![]() Quote:
KC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
|
![]()
Thanks Frank.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bethany, CT
Posts: 119
|
![]()
Very, very impressive.
Increase in displacement = 441 – 350 = 91 cubic inches Crank Horsepower = 568/0.80 = 710 max. HP Increase in horsepower = 710 - 405 =305 HP That’s an increase in displacement of ((441-350)/350) of 26% and an increase in horsepower of ((710-405)/405) of 75%. Would have been pretty good to get a horsepower increase in percentage equal to the displacement increase in percentage. Give your engine builder a nice bonus! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
|
![]()
It's all in the 60ft - thanks to the automatic. There are a number of big inch motors that can run with or beat mine on the top end, but I don't think anyone is getting sub 1.5 60 ft times at the track. I think a Lingenfelter 415 went 10.40 @ 135 once, but I think it also had front runners on it. I'm hoping to get a 10.30 or better next year. Considering the Density Altitude was +350 feet when I ran the 10.44, I think it's doable under the right weather and track conditions. Thanks. Kevin
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
|
![]()
Yes true - although I also have a friend with a stock displacement 350 who makes 474 @ the tire (about 570-580 @ crank) for an increase of 43% more power over stock with no displacement increase. His top end and mine are essentially carbon copies, with a couple of exceptions, so I know a bunch of my power is coming from the top end - cams, heads, etc. Thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lone Pine, CA
Posts: 580
|
![]()
thanx for the info. i think its allways safer to err on the conservative where tuning is concerned
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 956
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
Blue Botttle........Viagra?
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|