|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#1 |
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 13
|
Dyno Results
Hi All,
Got my Z Dyno on yesterday. Here was the best results. 317 hp 328 TQ Mods: Flowmaster Computer Does Anyone else have dyno results????????? |
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Dyno Results
Little lower than I would expect. But it may also be the high altitude.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#3 | |
 Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ATL. GA.
Posts: 2,170
|
Re: Dyno Results
Quote:
Stock was 326rwhp Mods: Flowmaster & chip 339rwhp 346tq |
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#4 |
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 1,071
|
Re: Dyno Results
Its my unrstanding that there is some kind of formula to calculate how much HP is lost per 1000' of altitude. I cant remember the figure per thousand ' though......anyone know??
__________________
[B]1990 #2815[/B] [COLOR="Red"][B]Red/Red[/B][/COLOR] Ported Plenum & IH (by Pete) Haibeck Chip Rebuilt FPR (by Phil) FIC Injectors Watson LT Headers 3" Stainless Works exhaust Lingenfelter Open Air Lid Bill B Built Transmission Shifter & C Beam Plates [FONT=Impact][COLOR=red]1992 [COLOR=black]#[/COLOR] 091[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Impact][COLOR=#ff0000]Red/[COLOR=silver]Gray[/COLOR][/COLOR][/FONT] [B]SOLD[/B] |
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#5 | |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Western Montana, now Maryland
Posts: 191
|
Re: Dyno Results
Quote:
Works out that 3%(0.03) times your HP= loss per 1000'  I don't have a sea level number for my car so my guestimate is: My car dyno'd at 376.1 HP @ 2320' 376.1 x 0.03 = 11.28 HP loss per 1000' Therefore 11.28 x 2.32 = 26.17 HP loss @ 2320' So supposedly at sea level my car should dyno @ 402.27HP. I hope to dyno it at Jeffs this Summer so we'll see...... 
__________________
Later-Bob :D [IMG]http://www.axoplasmic.com/800x600/toponzr1.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://www.axoplasmic.com/800x600/topoffzr1.jpg[/IMG][URL="http://axoplasmic.com/AXOPLASMIC/ZR1.html"]My '95 ZR-1 Home Page[/URL] |
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2008
|
#6 |
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
|
Re: Dyno Results
conversion factors: Denver 5800ft.
convert to sea level E.T x .9276 MPH x 1.0773 convert to altitude E.T. x 1.0781 MPH x .9282 Ananconda, Montana 5100ft. convert to sea level E.T. x .9367 MPH x 1.0675 convert to altidude E.T. x 1.0676 MPH x .9368
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y. Last edited by flyin ryan; 04-03-2008 at 11:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#7 |
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 4,632
|
Re: Dyno Results
i was going to say that they sound a bit low to me also
__________________
It's not the car, it's the people - Doug Johnson 90 r/r "KEYS ON" nick named "T.L.B" |
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#8 |
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
|
Re: Dyno Results
Considering the altitude, I'd say that is probably typical, all things considered.
I lived in Bailey CO (8500 feet) and I could tell a significant difference just between Denver (5280' amsl) and 8500', to say nothing of comparing my 95 LT1 coupe at 600'! Altitude is a big concern for me and my plans to move to CO to live. But, I guess all things being relative, performance will remain the same, compared to other cars (except for turbo or SC cars!). P. |
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#9 | |
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,700
|
Re: Dyno Results
Quote:
There's your answer. Forced Induction. |
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 32
|
Re: Dyno Results
Did mine a month ago at just above sea level. 70 deg. Dynojet Dyno.
FULL POWER 364.4 hp 345.05 lbft NORMAL 221.89 hp 276.37 lbft 92 ZR-1 B&B Top End porting chip |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
