ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2018   #1
BurnRubber
 
BurnRubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 10
Default 91 Injectors replaced by GM with NOS in 2005

I went ahead and replaced my injectors with the Accel 150821. I later found out the original multec injectors were replaced by GM in 2005. I ohmed all the multecs and they ran great. Is there any way to know if the Nos injectors GM installed were ever updated for ethanol or should I just leave the Accels in there?
__________________
91 Corvette ZR-1 #1346
BurnRubber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018   #2
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
Default Re: 91 Injectors replaced by GM with NOS in 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by BurnRubber View Post
I went ahead and replaced my injectors with the Accel 150821. I later found out the original multec injectors were replaced by GM in 2005. I ohmed all the multecs and they ran great. Is there any way to know if the Nos injectors GM installed were ever updated for ethanol or should I just leave the Accels in there?
I'd highly recommend you leave the Accels in there!

My NOS injectors were installed (according to the Corvette dealer) by GM in 2007. They went bad very shortly there after - and MAY have been a contributing cause of a burned exhaust valve a couple years later!

Fact is, very often the issue with the alcohol damaged injector (windings) does not manifest itself until the injectors reach (nearly) operating temperature. So, if you were to measure the resistance when they were at room temp, finding them to read "normal" resistance e.g., 12 or 14 Ω is more common than not - i.e., giving a false "good" resistance value!

No reason to remove the Accels. They're functioning just fine in several ZR-1s; mine included - for well over 6+ years now w/ ZERO issues!
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez!

90 #1202
"FBI" top end ported & relieved
Cam timing by "Pete the Greek"
Sans secondaries
Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive
SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs

Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018   #3
secondchance
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 3,723
Default Re: 91 Injectors replaced by GM with NOS in 2005

Agree with Paul 100%. Contrary to the myth that only early ZR-1s had injectors that wasn't designed for ethanol blend, my 94 injectors were bad when I bought the car in 2000.
I strongly recommend staying with Accels.
secondchance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2018   #4
BurnRubber
 
BurnRubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 10
Default Re: 91 Injectors replaced by GM with NOS in 2005

Well 6 years seems like a long enough test to confirm the Accels. My fuel trims are a little high at Idle and cruise but controlled at 138 as opposed to 128 for stochiometric. I guess I will keep the Accels in there.
__________________
91 Corvette ZR-1 #1346
BurnRubber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020