|
![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,542
|
![]()
So Chevy advertised my my90 as 375 hp. Is that flywheel hp or rear wheel hp? Mine dynoed at 311.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,542
|
![]()
So my math says about 357 flywheel hp. Acceptable?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,683
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,542
|
![]()
Thanks guys. Xfire, I like your math better. I did 311 X 1.15 to get my 15% loss. 366 sounds pretty good. Now if I can just squeez another buck and half out of it.
Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,786
|
![]()
My guess (which I mentioned on your other thread) was that you are losing 10-15 hp from exhaust restriction (your catalysts might be partially plugged)- or maybe from your intake boot collapsing. What rpm was your peak hp at?
There is always the possibility of loss from mileage, but I don't recall what you said about the condition of your car or the compression on the engine etc... I'm sure different dynos will vary 10 hp or so. I've heard you will get a different number in 3rd and a higher reading in 4th gear. Certainly if you are at a higher elevation, that could also explain a few percent loss...like about 3% per 1000ft elevation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,542
|
![]()
Mike, new exhaust is pending. Can't wait.
Peak hp at about 6k. Hood was open, never bothered to check the boot. Car has 39,000 miles. Dyno'd in 4th gear. I would expect elevation around 750'. This all started 'cause I stopped to look at a Vette and the sales guys said all hp since 75 or so is advertised as RWHP. I'm happy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Grand Island NE
Posts: 1,512
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dennis Fierstein 90 ZR-1 #2562 Atomic-Z ZR-1 Net Registry Chairman of the Board ZR-1 Net Registry Treasurer |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,786
|
![]()
well 2% loss (about 700 ft elevation) is about 367hp (from 375hp) at standard elevation and temps. of course the temp and atm pressure are usually measured and corrected on the dyno calc. There might be a correction number on the dyno plot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dunbarton NH
Posts: 7,542
|
![]()
Correction number was .96 as I remember. To convert to SAE.
He mentioned NH correction numbers are usually low. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Grand Island NE
Posts: 1,512
|
![]()
SAE is corrected, whereas STD is uncorrected.
__________________
Dennis Fierstein 90 ZR-1 #2562 Atomic-Z ZR-1 Net Registry Chairman of the Board ZR-1 Net Registry Treasurer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|