|
02-13-2010 | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston 90 Red ZR-1
Posts: 2,320
|
I'm so relieved.
I've had a vibration problem coming from the rear of my 90 Z for the past 1 1/2 or so and it's bugged the hell outta me as some of you already know. I've tried swapping the tires. No luck. I've replaced the rear wheel bearings. No luck. I've had a four point aligment done. No luck. Checked all of my bushings. Nothing loose. No luck. It's been bad enough that I couldn't even look out my rear view mirror because it shook so bad. I don't care how fast the car is it got to the point where it was no longer fun to drive anymore because above 60mph it felt unsafe. So I decided thats it I'm going to find and fix this problem if it kills me. I've taken this car to 179mph many times and now I can't even take it above 60mph? F that. And I found it and fixed it today damn it. It was my fault all along. A total rookie mistake that I can't believe I made. But it was something I had suspected all along. The last time I replaced my throwout bearing/fidanza and clutch disk I installed my drive shaft 180 degrees out. And let me tell you something! That makes all the difference in the world. When I spun the wheel by hand and watched the drive shaft I swear it looked like it had 1/8 in run out. When I rotated it 180 and bolted it back together and spun it by hand again it ran totally true. The shaft and the ujoint rear diff already had white paint on them to mark proper orientation and I swore I installed it right. I must have been in a rush. But it runs totally smooth now. No vibration or roaring noise. I felt like slapping myself over that one.
|
02-13-2010 | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Thanks for sharing this valuable info and glad to hear it worked out for you.
|
02-13-2010 | #3 |
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Simple mistake many have made over the years, don't beat yourself up over it .
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y. |
02-13-2010 | #4 |
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,431
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Good to hear all is in proper orientation now
__________________
95 ZR-1 BLK/Gry #392 LT5 Reg# 868 *RIP* ZR1NET Founding Mem #155 |
02-14-2010 | #5 |
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Thanks for sharing!
However, balance is one thing...but runout is another. Runout... Hmmmm.... That surprises me. Unless something was a leeetle bit cockeyed when it was installed, I wouldn't expect you to have runout. (Just curious thinking out loud here.) Glad you found the problem tho! I hope I marked mine before we (Lee and I) took it apart last August. I guess I've got a 50-50 chance of having the same problem (only w/ my luck, it is more like a 90% chance of getting it wrong!) P.
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez! 90 #1202 "FBI" top end ported & relieved Cam timing by "Pete the Greek" Sans secondaries Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry |
02-14-2010 | #6 | |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston 90 Red ZR-1
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Quote:
|
|
02-14-2010 | #7 |
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arcadia,OK
Posts: 3,394
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Not to add fuel to the debate about runout vs balance, but they are not necessarily the same thing. Run out most always results in imbalance in rotating mass when all diameters are concentric. However, eccentric imbalance could theroetically be offset by mass, such as increased wall thickness (mass) if it were opposite the runout.
Mass imbalance, such as that which could occur in the driveshaft, can be the result of any or all of the foloowing; (1)tube manufacturing tolerances, i.e. wall thickness variations, (2)tube/yoke welds or (3)yoke forging and machining variations. Vibration aside, if you had 1/8" runout that was fixed by rotating the driveshaft 180 degrees, it was either an installation issue or some really bad parts. Just my 2 cents worth...
__________________
Jerry Downey JERRYS LT5 GASKETS & PARTS http://www.jerrysgaskets.com 1994 ZR-1, Black/Black, Lingenfelter Aerobody, 416cu in, 3.91 gears, coil-over susp, Brembo brakes, etc. 2016 Black-Red, 3LT-Z51 Auto 8-speed. |
02-14-2010 | #8 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston 90 Red ZR-1
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Absolutely Jerry. I think the drive shaft could have a wall thickness variance and they may have purposely welded the end cap out of faze to help compensate for it. Which would explain why at 0 degrees it has runout and at 180 degrees it runs true. That makes sense to me. And I suspect my Z is not the only one that's like that. Some may be worse than others.
|
02-14-2010 | #9 | |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Innsbrook, Missouri
Posts: 1,727
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
Quote:
|
|
02-14-2010 | #10 |
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,890
|
Re: I'm so relieved.
You might need to explain exactly your "rotation"! If you only changed the relationship of the rear joint to the pinion flange you changed "nothing" in relation to the drive-shaft and that seems to be what you imply here.
The only explanation in this case would be that the balance of the pinion flange isn't correct. If your pinion flange is an original it would have a sheetmetal deflector that would have a weight on it. I've heard of the pinion flange being balanced with a drive-shaft assembly but I've never done it or actually seen it done. NOW if you removed the slip-yoke from the drive-shaft and rotated it 180* you certainly would have effected balance. It would seem to me that there was more likely an install error the previous install or maybe one of the tangs on the pinion flange has been compromised and allowed the u-joint to be secured off center! There's one simple remaining fact though, if you "saw what you explain here" the drive-shaft needs to be removed one more time and checked for balance and the run-out you explained. It certainly shouldn't see "speed" until it's verified! |
|
|