|
02-09-2010 | #1 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,653
|
3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
For those out there that have made the switch from 3:45's to 4:10's, what kind of gas mileage change have you seen?
I'm driving to BG in May from Idaho and don't want to swap the gears right now if I will see a drastic drop in mileage. That could add substantially to the trip cost. Thanks
__________________
[I][FONT=Comic Sans MS]John Boyd[/FONT][/I] [I][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]Ideho[/SIZE][/FONT][/I] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][I]2015 ZL1 [/I][I]Camaro #1121 BLACK/BLACK 6 SPD (540 RWHP)[/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [I][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]1991 ZR-1 #458 [COLOR=red]RED/[/COLOR][COLOR=black]BLACK 72[/COLOR]k miles ([B][COLOR=red]SOLD[/COLOR][/B]) 1991 ZR-1 #473 [COLOR=red]RED/[/COLOR][COLOR=black]BLACK [/COLOR]37k miles ([B][COLOR=red]SOLD[/COLOR][/B])[/SIZE][/FONT][/I] |
02-10-2010 | #2 |
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario. Canada
Posts: 1,538
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
I have 4.10s and usually get around 25/26 on the highway. Depends on the weight of your foot though too
__________________
1991 #1516 Black/Black davidmkelly.com "Speed is often confused with insight." - Johan Cruijff |
02-10-2010 | #3 |
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,661
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Not seen much of a difference after installing 4.10s in my case.
|
02-10-2010 | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Just do it.................. You'll enjoy your drive and get to use 6th gear.
|
02-11-2010 | #5 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,653
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Mopar P5007043 viper gears, from where
http://www.trademotion.com/auction/index.cfm?siteid=214650&catalogid=0 Call Jeromy for prices, under $300 shipped.
__________________
[I][FONT=Comic Sans MS]John Boyd[/FONT][/I] [I][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]Ideho[/SIZE][/FONT][/I] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][I]2015 ZL1 [/I][I]Camaro #1121 BLACK/BLACK 6 SPD (540 RWHP)[/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [I][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]1991 ZR-1 #458 [COLOR=red]RED/[/COLOR][COLOR=black]BLACK 72[/COLOR]k miles ([B][COLOR=red]SOLD[/COLOR][/B]) 1991 ZR-1 #473 [COLOR=red]RED/[/COLOR][COLOR=black]BLACK [/COLOR]37k miles ([B][COLOR=red]SOLD[/COLOR][/B])[/SIZE][/FONT][/I] |
02-11-2010 | #6 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ideho
Posts: 2,653
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Why are the ARP studs being used?
have there been problems with the bolts? I know they are 20 years old but there are billions of cars with bolts running around. Does the extra clamping force offered change the setup at all?
__________________
[I][FONT=Comic Sans MS]John Boyd[/FONT][/I] [I][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]Ideho[/SIZE][/FONT][/I] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][I]2015 ZL1 [/I][I]Camaro #1121 BLACK/BLACK 6 SPD (540 RWHP)[/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [I][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1]1991 ZR-1 #458 [COLOR=red]RED/[/COLOR][COLOR=black]BLACK 72[/COLOR]k miles ([B][COLOR=red]SOLD[/COLOR][/B]) 1991 ZR-1 #473 [COLOR=red]RED/[/COLOR][COLOR=black]BLACK [/COLOR]37k miles ([B][COLOR=red]SOLD[/COLOR][/B])[/SIZE][/FONT][/I] |
02-11-2010 | #7 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Dakota/California
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
I am assuming you are assured full depth of the stud. Once stud is set you get full locking of the nut. One other advantage.....you are not turning the stud while applying the final torque on the nut. These ARP studs would work great for Head Bolts to obtain more even torque. Does anyone use these ARP type studs for head bolts? Last edited by Dynomite; 02-11-2010 at 11:09 AM. |
|
02-11-2010 | #8 |
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,741
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Studs are obviously the preferred method, no disputing that, right? But I didn't bother with mine, ...unless a person is going to the ΒΌ mile often with good (sticky) tires, factory bolts are fine. If you want to do it, just because, only really need to the one side. The one cap takes all the load, other side is more or less along for the ride. Also if a person does convert over to ARP studs, better be absolutly sure to have the 'New' correct TQ. spec. & what lube to use. Another thing...Don't 'Double-Nut' the stud in tight to the case...Finger tight only into the case....VERY important!!
__________________
There are no limit's mans ingenuity, just as mans ingenuity will never conquer the forces & behavior of this planet...Smokey Y. |
02-11-2010 | #9 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
As for the POR-15, no rust on the aluminum but I wanted to clean it up and it did not look very good after my other attempts. POR-15 is just an excellent product that I have been using for over 20 years and it is very durable as it will seal the aluminum from corrosion or discoloration. The yokes on mine were quite rusty and why I used it on that portion. If you are a purist/NCRS type then you will want to keep it all naturalllllll........... |
|
02-12-2010 | #10 | |||
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Dakota/California
Posts: 3,798
|
Re: 3:45's vs 4:10's MPG
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The sources provided by everyone (updated) for parts to install 410s are all in post #10 in this thread. I put all the 410 information in Hammer's thread herein because gas mileage is always an issue with 410s. Not much is said for the best rational for switching to 410s (sixth gear becomes usefull at speeds under 75 mph) Also, when Hammer installs his 410s I am hoping he will add pictures and suggestions here in this thread since he should now be convinced to install the 410s before BG. It will be interesting how Hammer shims and sets backlash to get that perfect contact pattern as HAWAIIZR-1 ended up with on his 410s (post #40). http://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7419&page=4 Rarely there are some issues related to over spinning the output shaft on the transmission with 410s which ZFdoc at billb@zfdoc.com has explained in detail on another forum. http://forums.*************.com/c4-z...at-find-2.html The ************* do not mean X-rated which I just do not understand the use of *********** Last edited by Dynomite; 02-12-2010 at 07:46 PM. |
|||
|
|