|
03-16-2008 | #1 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reston, Virginia
Posts: 939
|
Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
Can see why the C6 rear area is so much easier to access>>>> For the side view I placed the front wheels on same line... not much of either car shows from side>> Of course the 'eye candy' LT5 shot>>> Parting shot>>> I think both have merits although the perceived smaller look of the ZR-1 is appealing... but each to his own and glad we have choices Michael
__________________
Michael :cheers: [I][SIZE="2"]1990 RED on RED #566[/SIZE][/I] [I][SIZE="2"]WAZOO MEMBER[/I][/SIZE] |
03-16-2008 | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 201
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
I like the C6, but the ZR-1 FTW in looks. Great Pics
|
03-16-2008 | #3 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Posts: 262
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
I also have a C6 and a ZR-1. When the Z's alone, the rear end looks MASSIVE, but sitting next to the C6, it looks really, really small. I guess it's all about perspective...
Nice stable!
__________________
[B]1990 Black ZR-1 #2212[/B] Totaled... :( [B]2007 Z51 'vert :mrgreen:[/B] [B]1988 35th Ann. Edition #962[/B] (Sold...) :cry: |
03-16-2008 | #4 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germantown, Maryland
Posts: 522
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
Beautiful cars Michael. People tell me my car is clean and I say to them....you should see his! Hey, they are both awesome cars. My goal is to have a C-6 daily driver too.
- Keith '90 Red/Red #1383 |
03-16-2008 | #5 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes ca.
Posts: 544
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
talk about a mind blower , i thought the c6 was alot smaller car than the zr1.
|
03-16-2008 | #6 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 298
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
Gotta say it....
Where's the money shot?
__________________
1990 Grey/Black Too many for the sig. |
03-16-2008 | #7 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,708
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
I think the C4 was the last of the "pretty" Corvettes with finer lines. It had more classic sports car lines in the same vain as the XKE type of pretty. The C5 and C6 are more brutish looking and built to look more powerful. My $.02.
|
03-16-2008 | #8 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reston, Virginia
Posts: 939
|
Re: Nose to nose; Butt to butt; Side to side Part II
The C5 and C6 are more brutish looking and built to look more powerful.
I agree...definitely the trend was to the agressive look..shark like. Interesting though are a few stats: C6 weighs about 200 lbs less that the ZR-1 (MY90) and about 110 lbs less that the C5 ZR-1 (MY90) Wheel Base- 96.2" Front Tread- 61.9" Rear Tread- 59.6" Height: 46.8" C5: Wheel Base- 104.5" Front Tread- 62.1" Rear Tread- 62" Height- 47.7" C6: Wheel Base- 106" Front Tread- 62" Rear Tread- 61" Height: 49" So what Vette Team has been doing from the C4 to the C6 is to lighten car, stretch wheelbase, reduce length and width: ZR-1 Overall length- 177.4" Width- 74.0" C5 Overall length- 179.7 Width- 73.6" C6 Overall length- 174.6 Width- 72.6" The picture IMO do not show that reduction and in fact make the C6 look larger (might be the ~2" height gain??)
__________________
Michael :cheers: [I][SIZE="2"]1990 RED on RED #566[/SIZE][/I] [I][SIZE="2"]WAZOO MEMBER[/I][/SIZE] Last edited by ZR1Vette; 03-16-2008 at 04:40 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|