|
11-15-2012 | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jupiter, Fl.
Posts: 815
|
4.56's for the Strip and Street?
Many ZR-1 owners consider 4.10 gears an ideal compromise gear for street and strip, because with stock gears 6th is virtually useless unless you're going at least ten miles over the national limits. With stock tire sizes, 4.10's allow the car to use fourth gear in the qtr. mile. But, even so, fourth doesn't come near topping out in the quarter with 4.10's. So, how about 4.56's which allow you to go through the traps in the low 7K range, using the full range of RPM in the first four gears.
So, the theory with 4.56's is, not to use first gear except at the strip, and that still allows 6th gear for decent mileage. Is there anyone out there that's using 4.56 gears now? If so, what's your opinion? |
11-15-2012 | #2 |
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 1,802
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
to add to the question- Do you need a different carrier beyond a certain ratio due to an ever decreasing pinion diameter? Or do the D44 vette applications just increase the ring gear thickness accordingly?
On that note, I will say that I have been told by a guy I met here locally that used to have a 95 that 3.73 was the most effective mod he did to his Z. |
11-15-2012 | #3 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CenCoast California
Posts: 899
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
Obviously, for drag racing, as long as you have a tire under the back that can get the car to hook with such a short ratio, a 4.56 or even maybe a 4.88 gear makes more sense than 3.45, 3.73s or even 4.11s.
The downside is, if the car's driven regularly on the street, poor mileage and high rpm at cruise speeds. Another downside is if you went to 4.5s along with going to a big tire in back to get the car to hook, then the next thing to break are rear axles and axle shafts.
__________________
Hib Halverson Technical Writer former owner 95 VIN 0140 current owner 19 VIN 1878 |
11-15-2012 | #4 | |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jupiter, Fl.
Posts: 815
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
Quote:
A lot of people choose 3.73's. It's a good compromise. But that's the problem, any choice is a compromise depending on what you're doing with the car. I'm curious as to what is the best actual tire/gear combo for a stock, or stock block ZR-1 to have for the quarter mile. 255x50x16" BFG DR's are a good tire. Slightly larger, and with 1" more sidewall to create a bigger footprint at low pressure. Used with 88' 16" Corvette wheels, they fit on the ZR-1. Paired with the 4.56's they would be my pick for the strip. Along with a pair of those new radial skinnies up front. |
|
11-15-2012 | #5 |
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lake Bluff, IL
Posts: 2,088
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
When I had my '93 one of my early mods in about 1995 was to add 4.10 rear gears. I loved them. Gas mileage dropped a bit, but the improvement in accelleration over the stock 3.45s was very noticeable. At one point afterwards I drove a ZR-1 with 3.73 gears but I did not think it was as good on acceleration and it cost the same to install. Gas mileage is arguably better. With 4.10s the car is much more responsive in sixth gear and still cruises nicely. I do have to use 4th gear to get through the 1/4 mile but I only do that once or twice a year vs driving regularly the rest of the time. When I got the '95 last summer 4.10s were one of the first mods I did. I have ridden in (non-ZR1) cars with both 4.56 and 5.13 gears and IMHO they are not for everyday driving. On the former you don't need 1st gear and on the latter you probably don't need 2nd either!--Bob
__________________
2016 Long Beach Red Z06 #10281 "POPS Z" 1995 Polo Green #409 "WARP TEN"--Haibeck 350/510 package, 4.10s, Hurst, Stock Exhaust with QTP Cutouts --Sold but still running strong 1993 Quasar Blue #161 "HIL KING" --Sold but still running strong, now with more than 120,000 miles 1967 Marlboro Maroon/Saddle Corvette Coupe 300 hp/4-spd --Sold a long time ago ZR-1 Net Registry Founding Member #95 NCM Lifetime Member Favorite Quote--Attributed to Mickey Thompson: "Too Much Horsepower is Almost Enough" |
11-16-2012 | #6 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL.
Posts: 29
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
I have a 92 with top end work with a 4.30 rear. At the finish line I'm at 6800 rpm in 4 th. which is where I shift at. It's great for the street and track. The car turns 11.70's all day at 118 to 121 mph.
__________________
Titusville FL. |
11-16-2012 | #7 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jupiter, Fl.
Posts: 815
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
So Phil, the 4.56's would put you right around 7,200 in the traps. Sounds good to me.
Do you still use 1st gear normally around town? or not? |
11-16-2012 | #8 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL.
Posts: 29
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
My car peaks at 6800 rpm,So anything higher than that does not do me any good. I went slower with the 4.56's in the same car, I was at 7400 at the traps, Way to much for this engine set up. I have a 415 car that does not like the 4.30 gear, Its very happy with a 4.10. With the 4.30 11.0's. With the 4.10's 10.85.I shift the car at 7400 end up at 7100 to 7200 rpm.
Yes I still use 1th gear, It's fun.
__________________
Titusville FL. Last edited by Phil DeJohn; 11-16-2012 at 10:16 AM. |
11-16-2012 | #9 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
|
Re: 4.56's for the Strip and Street?
Quote:
4.10s I've heard it said is ideal for the ZR-1; "would have been standard if not for mileage consideration" (as the story goes). I'm not so sure. A 4.30 has appeal too and would put me a little higher in 4th gear - more or less in the "wheel house" if I could reach 122-124 mph in the quarter. Pete doing 129.xx in 3rd on his stock bottom 350...still just blows me away. I've driven that car once, and I was in awe! It seems (to me) the added shift might be the issue, aside from launching the Z. Looking at Pete's times comparing times with the 3.45s to his 4.10s, I think the edge is with the 4.10s, but not by as much as one might hope. Others have espressed similar comparisons between those two ratios. I'd like to know what people thought of the 4.30s vs. 4.10s compared to 3.45s. I've not driven a 4.56 car, but an associate of mine had them, and I didn't like the trade-off for a street driven car - a personal thing, I admit. P.
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez! 90 #1202 "FBI" top end ported & relieved Cam timing by "Pete the Greek" Sans secondaries Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry |
|
11-16-2012 | #10 |
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Boone County, Indiana
Posts: 132
|
A hundred years ago.......
I had a '68 Chevelle, small block, headers, double-pumper, accel dual-point, mild hydraulic cam..and 4.56 posi with factory air shocks..first gear was unreal, but very, very brief.....I think the damn thing wouldn't run much faster than 110-115 flat out....I bought it new, and traded for a '70 when I came back from VN.....I have regretted that deal ever since...
The 4.56 was fun, but not the most user-friendly ratio... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|