ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 General Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2012   #1
LGAFF
 
LGAFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,194
Default Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Results from Dyno Jet test.....VETTE December 1997
Test of 91 with stock tune and stock exhaust manifolds....

Stock 305hp@5600 304ftlbs@4400

KN 310@ 5650 303@4400

+Borla 327@5750 314@5000

+EH Porting 345@5850 339@5150
**Porting was extrude hone ...28hp/29ftlbs increase at 5100
__________________
LGAFF
90 #966-150K miles-sold
92 #234-sold
1987 Callaway TT #17
1991 ZR-1 #1359
LGAFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012   #2
tomtom72
 
tomtom72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL USA
Posts: 4,645
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Just curious, did they say if they port matched the I/H's to the head ports?

nice numbers with out a tune or headers. JMHO
__________________
1990 ZR-1, Black/grey, #2233, stock. ZR-1 Net Reg Founding Member #316 & NCM member
tomtom72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012   #3
LGAFF
 
LGAFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,194
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

They did not port match...
__________________
LGAFF
90 #966-150K miles-sold
92 #234-sold
1987 Callaway TT #17
1991 ZR-1 #1359
LGAFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012   #4
VetteMed
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,828
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

interesting info. Thanks for posting, Lee.
__________________
2004 Z06/Z16 LeMans Commemorative Edition
1991 ZR-1 #302 White/Gray (sold)
1991 ZR-1 #1147 Red/Saddle (sold)
VetteMed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012   #5
LGAFF
 
LGAFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,194
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Stock Vs K& N


K&N(stock) vs Borla and K&N



Borla and K&N vs EH, Borla and K&N

__________________
LGAFF
90 #966-150K miles-sold
92 #234-sold
1987 Callaway TT #17
1991 ZR-1 #1359

Last edited by LGAFF; 02-12-2012 at 08:23 PM.
LGAFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2012   #6
1990 quasar blue
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ma
Posts: 404
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Wow only 305. I thought mine was a little weak when it only made 320/320 stock. Most seem to make 330 or so.
__________________
1990 ZR1 #2574
Medium Quasar Blue Metallic
1 of 19
1990 quasar blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2012   #7
gbmidyear66
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 252
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

My car (also a 1 or 19 Quasar) Dyno'd last summer at 358 with Flowmaster and a custom tune....
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
__________________
1990 Corvette ZR-1 #2824
4.10's, Custom PROM, Flowmaster, Top End Port
NCRS BC Chapter
gbmidyear66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2012   #8
1990 quasar blue
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ma
Posts: 404
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbmidyear66 View Post
My car (also a 1 or 19 Quasar) Dyno'd last summer at 358 with Flowmaster and a custom tune....
Not bad at all. That's three more hp than I got with ported plenum I/h, flowmaster catback and an HAT prom.
__________________
1990 ZR1 #2574
Medium Quasar Blue Metallic
1 of 19
1990 quasar blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2012   #9
Corbusa
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 581
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Do you guys have pictures to share of the ported areas? years ago I used to port match older heads , water pumps , intakes etc.. I would be interested in seeing some finish work- if possible.. For me when I get to the point of porting ,I'll send the heads to one of you Pro's on here. I won't gamble on a LT5 head..
Corbusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2012   #10
Paul Workman
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,493
Default Re: Dyno Test: Mod Progression

Some pix of work in progress, just to give you an idea...

The porting begins with a plan; it may be a copy of a successful model, or a new pioneering adventure. The point is, there is considerably more to it than making holes bigger. LT5 parts are expensive. So, unless you have experience with porting and have a basic appreciation for the principles at work, then sending it out to someone that does have a model will probably be cheaper and results predictable in the end.

I say this, because these pix of my setup may or may not be representative of what your's might look like, depending on the application - or it might be similar if you send it to IL for one of the FBI gang to do for you (recommended). I'm just saying...Mine may not look like yours or anyone elses. K
That said...

...this is a 90 IH. Notice the primary runner looks fairly clean. The injector buss is completely removed (the primary injector on the 90 is sealed at the top of the injector). What remains in the secondary runner is a nub of what was a rather large intrusion; the boss containing the seal for the secondary injector gasket.



In this picture you're looking down the IH at the head transition.



Here we see the head port matching in progress with the head in place. The ball gauge is a steel ball held by one of those magnetic wands. A plastic shower curtain is laid over the entire engine bay to keep chips etc from getting where they shouldn't be - like an operating room in a hospital!



I'll let you in on a little secret: Some only port match a short distance down into the head on the primary side. And, some don't even touch the secondary side of the head as it is already 36mm across. BIG (hp) mistake!

If you taper the port from the top of the head down nearly to the valve guide, then the shape of the runner will conform to good engineering practice as far as avoiding sudden changes in the passage diameter...if you get my drift. It WILL be worth the effort...as long as you don't stray off the line and get into the water or (worse) oil cavities.



A picture of the top of the head after the heads were fully ported.



Some feel removing the secondaries will not affect hp to any significant degree. Well, laminar flow dynamics says the highest velocity in the column will be in the center of the air column. How much hp is gained by removing them? I wish I could say. However, them being there flies in the face optimum flow dynamics principles. I removed mine. 400 RWHP is possible with plenum and IH porting, with proper head port matching, in conjuction with headers and a tune. Over 30 more RWHP is possible with full porting and cam timing.

Well, not a lot of detailed info. But, you get an idea of the symetry anyway.



P.
__________________
Good carz, good food, good friendz = the best of timez!

90 #1202
"FBI" top end ported & relieved
Cam timing by "Pete the Greek"
Sans secondaries
Chip & dyno tuning by Haibeck Automotive
SW headers, X-pipe, MF muffs

Former Secretary, ZR-1 Net Registry

Last edited by Paul Workman; 02-18-2012 at 04:32 PM.
Paul Workman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020