ZR-1 Net Registry Forums  

Go Back   ZR-1 Net Registry Forums > C4 ZR-1 > C4 ZR-1 Technical Postings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2017   #81
Roadster
 
Roadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Warrington PA
Posts: 1,914
Default Re: New option for fuel pump replacement

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ABI VT View Post
Definitely helped thank you ! Just knowing that would have made me change them out regardless I definitely will post up! I checked after reading your post that they did show available on amazon.ca for the correct part number. But with the strainers (likely wouldn't need another pair) it would have been close to the cost of the lpe pumps which on their website shows are included for the cost so I went with that. I spoke with Ken at lpe briefly and I was convinced (lol). I figured no one really talks about walbro or performance brands much so I at the least I could add something to the forums regarding that setup.
Ok, in the process of more research.....really makes your head spin...
What I would suggest is to make sure your getting the product you need and at the best cost possible.
Case in point, Mike checked Amazon and the Denso 951-5006 unit is listed there for under $20, but their site mentions that it doesn't fit the LT5. The same (think they are the same) units I ordered are more than $20, and are a direct fit for the LT5. The one Denso listed on Amazon is made in China, the Denso unit that Mike used is made in Mexico. I am calling tomorrow to check where the units I have on order will be made.
We would all like a quality product regardless where it is made and hopefully that is what we purchase. I would like to see more USA units made, as with some of the China based automotive products have been in question over the years concerning quality and reliability. That being said, ineffective quality control could take place anywhere.

Also take note that there are many sites that do not distinguish the difference between the LT1 and LT5 fuel pumps in their specs. One exception appears to be Rock Auto that does show a difference in part #'s for the two engines. But one thing I found very interesting is that the
PERFORMANCE ELECTRIC P240KC fuel pumps that are popular are listed for both the LT1 and the LT5, while other brands on their site do show different part #'s pertaining to the different engines.

IMO, this is one of many instances where you really need to check everything out before making a purchase.
__________________
Tom

1994 ZR-1 #009 "captured test fleet car"
1974 LS4 454 Vert
1974 L-82 355 Vert.
1982 L83 CFI...now a retired "dd"....Sold

WAZOO Member

Last edited by Roadster; 05-09-2017 at 12:20 AM.
Roadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2017   #82
Hog
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: New option for fuel pump replacement

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ABI VT View Post
Glad to hear you figured it out was it a hesitation like mine ?

I'm also going to take everyone's advice on the stainless clamps and do that for sure . I will feel happy to find a broken plastic clip but not expecting it!!
Here's a clip I made last year and while I have had other symptoms of my clutch being worn in this case it can be felt and my rpms aren't slipping and rising which is a common clutch -slip symptom but I can feel and hear the delay in acceleration when hitting the next gear and it has made me suspect the pumps. I have changed plugs, wires, coils, injectors, o2 sensors and the map sensor. This video was taken after it all. Leads me back to the beggining ..

Around 14-15 second mark in the video.

https://youtu.be/bH7F59FKPEU
If you were able to view your WOT fuel pressure I'm thinking it would be ramping up during those periods when you are getting back on the throttle after you upshift.
As soon as you go WOT the ECM would be commanding very high pulsewidths, with all 16 injectors firing the fuel system is fighting to supply them with fuel and it takes a moment to get the fuel pressure back up.
Throwing some powershifts would eliminate your issue I'm guessing as the throttles remain open and there is no ramping up to full power. You would be looking for just under 52 psi at all times, IIRC the OEM regulator is set at 51.8psi for LT5.


A fuel pressure gauge taped to the windshield would tell the tale.


Cutting open fuel filters is a good idea as well. It doesn't take much to start to plug these high pressure fuel systems. I had a 66psi OEM GM system that woudnt rev over 4500rpm at WOT, I was surprised what was in the filter.






Mr Haibeck says that you require 51psi plus or minus 1 psi at WOT 3000-7000rpm. If you see less that 47psi of WOT fuel pressure, reduced power and knocking and possible codes can result. He agrees with talking her for a spin with the gauge taped to the windshield, he does make a good point to use a passenger though. The fuel pressure should snap up to 51 +/-psi (from around 43psi during normal driving when engine vacuum is high) when you stand on the throttle, then you know the FPR is working, or if you are at idle and you disconnect the vacuum supply to the FPR, you will see 51psi or so.
__________________
peace
Paul

ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494
Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2017   #83
5ABI VT
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 783
Default Re: New option for fuel pump replacement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog View Post
If you were able to view your WOT fuel pressure I'm thinking it would be ramping up during those periods when you are getting back on the throttle after you upshift.
As soon as you go WOT the ECM would be commanding very high pulsewidths, with all 16 injectors firing the fuel system is fighting to supply them with fuel and it takes a moment to get the fuel pressure back up.
Throwing some powershifts would eliminate your issue I'm guessing as the throttles remain open and there is no ramping up to full power. You would be looking for just under 52 psi at all times, IIRC the OEM regulator is set at 51.8psi for LT5.


A fuel pressure gauge taped to the windshield would tell the tale.


Cutting open fuel filters is a good idea as well. It doesn't take much to start to plug these high pressure fuel systems. I had a 66psi OEM GM system that woudnt rev over 4500rpm at WOT, I was surprised what was in the filter.






Mr Haibeck says that you require 51psi plus or minus 1 psi at WOT 3000-7000rpm. If you see less that 47psi of WOT fuel pressure, reduced power and knocking and possible codes can result. He agrees with talking her for a spin with the gauge taped to the windshield, he does make a good point to use a passenger though. The fuel pressure should snap up to 51 +/-psi (from around 43psi during normal driving when engine vacuum is high) when you stand on the throttle, then you know the FPR is working, or if you are at idle and you disconnect the vacuum supply to the FPR, you will see 51psi or so.
I looked briefly for a fuel pressure gauge to tape to the windshield but am not sure what the fitting size is etc. is it the same as an LT1 ? The car never hesitated like that before (few runway events on YouTube I have have no lag whatsoever) I have a few videos I won't post because we were being naughty on the highways at night but the hesitation was much more prominent. It still pulls decent with the hesitation but something is going on.

Last edited by 5ABI VT; 05-11-2017 at 04:11 AM.
5ABI VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2017   #84
Hog
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: New option for fuel pump replacement

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ABI VT View Post
I looked briefly for a fuel pressure gauge to tape to the windshield but am not sure what the fitting size is etc. is it the same as an LT1 ? The car never hesitated like that before (few runway events on YouTube I have have no lag whatsoever) I have a few videos I won't post because we were being naughty on the highways at night but the hesitation was much more prominent. It still pulls decent with the hesitation but something is going on.
I took a quick look and it looks like the LT1 and Lt5 fitting should be the same. I have no idea on what the fitting size is, all GM stuff was the same, my gauge came with the correct size.


Used on everything GM from 1991-2012.
Description
"Fuel Rail Pressure Relief Valve Distributor-Breakerless ignition"

US$18.26
GM p/n 12570619






This thread throws around some possible sizes.
http://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread....=fuel+pressure


Whatever your issue is, the engine sure recovers quickly afterwards. I can totally understand thinking it might be a clutch issue.


After much digging, I found a thread that specifies the correct un regulated or WOT fuel pressure of 50.76 psi. So if you find 51 psi plus or minus 1 psi at WOT your golden. It was tpepmeie who reported the actual LT5 fuel pressure of 50.76psi. At 50.76psi of fuel pressure, the stock injectors will flow 22.14 lb/hr and at 43.5psi they would flow 20.5 lb/hr.


This is the thread where I was referencing Mark Haibecks info.
http://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread.php?t=14739


__________________
peace
Paul

ZR-1 Net Registry Member #1494

Last edited by Hog; 05-11-2017 at 10:54 AM.
Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ZR-1 Net Registry 2020