![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 885
|
![]()
If these numbers are accurate, I'm a happy camper
![]() RWHP 337 "corrected for temp/humidity/pressure" = 353 RWTQ 320 "corrected" = 335 (both at a whopping 5500 RPM or so) They had some issues loading it on the dyno and by the time they were ready, the car was already pretty hot. I tried to convince him that redline was a little higher too ... There was only one useful pull, and here are the sheets ![]() ![]() ![]() The techs hadn't seen an LT5 in person, although several knew about it. The only "mods" I have are Corsa exhaust and SLP claw intake. The engine runs great after I replaced the fuel injectors. OK, gurus ... let me know your thoughts. Is this thing really 400HP at the crank? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
yep, corrected thats 400-410 crank
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 Last edited by LGAFF; 07-22-2013 at 06:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,446
|
![]()
HP was still climbing at 5653 RPM
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 3,674
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 982
|
![]()
That's the same type of dyno (at least the website on the printout) that I ran my '92 on. The operator took my LT5 to the same rpm before shutdown.
Good numbers. With headers and a chip I would guess you will hit 370whp no problem! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
Time to get headers and a ported top end....
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 885
|
![]() ![]() Yup ... it got a little loud in there http://s517.photobucket.com/user/Nat...aacb0.mp4.html (I haven't hosted a video on photobucket before, so I'm not sure this will work) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 9,686
|
![]()
My thoughts exactly. Power peak is too low. The WCF means With Correction Factor, but which one? SAE, Standard?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Squires (near Ava MO in the Mark Twain N'tl Forest) - Missouri
Posts: 6,466
|
![]()
Strong numbers, to be sure.
Researching dyno calibration specs a bit, it appears (cutting to the chase) that a 4% variance exists between STD & SAE correction factors, stemming from the fact that SAE normalizes to 77ºF whereas STD normalizes to 60ºF Also, the SAE 1349 spec requires correction for torque, relative to the mechanical efficiency (ME), or estimated at 85% at peak torque ONLY. It is still a little vague (to me) how ME is affected when the engine is producing other than peak torque, but intuition tells me as counter rotational force (drive train inertia) diminishes, ME increases. The result would be a reduction in calculated hp at those non-peak torque regions of the rpm band. In any case, the dyno operator was obviously conditioned to lift when his ear told him he'd reached the limit of conventional pushrod motors. The sound of the LT5 screaming past 5500 on its way to 7k+ scares the crap outta some operators, and the unaccustomed as well. Well...Now that the hook is set, it is time for some FBI top end porting...and then...and then... Yeah, speed is addicting! ![]() P. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 7,180
|
![]()
put it on the real world dyno(track) and see how she does....
__________________
LGAFF 90 #966-150K miles-sold 92 #234-sold 1987 Callaway TT #17 1991 ZR-1 #1359 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|