![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
This question is not for me, but one of the ZR-1 guys in Japan. He needs to rebuild his motor and want to build the biggest LT5 possible, but purchasing a new crank is not feasible with cost and shipping. Does anyone know what combination of liners/pistons/rods can be used and what size it will end up?
Sorry if this information is already available and posted. I could not find it if so. Thanks!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 309
|
![]()
Is he willing to do an offset grind on the crank or keep it totally stock? I believe Pete is the person to answer this question.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: lone pine and mammoth lakes
Posts: 1,406
|
![]()
yeah pete can give you all the info ,but i believe its 401ci, offset grinding the crank and using 4.125 piston and liners
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicagoland,IL
Posts: 2,667
|
![]()
Guys i'm no engine builder/expert.
I would say stock crank offset to 3.75 with 4.125 bore makes 401. i know this will work very well. I also know stock crank can be offset to 3.85 but i don't know much about 1.900 rods,this will make a 411ci. I hear different stories on the 1.900 rods they work fine in a 9k RPM Honda some say LT5 parts are heavier so it won't work. ![]() Flyan Ryan might have more input on the 1.900 rods durability. Pete P.S. My choice is 401 should get around 500rwhp w/stock cams cost is about a 1/3 of a 415ci. for the do it yourselfer.
__________________
'91 #1635 PoloGreen 350 LT5 11.09 @ 129.27 11.04 @ 128.86 474RWHP 400RWTQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFNFOhGGlR4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlRIOMwaDYY https://sites.google.com/site/peteszr1garage |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Thanks guys!!!
I found this on EES: Using your stock crankshaft: 4.100 bore, 3.75 stroke = 396cid 4.125 bore, 3.75 stroke = 401cid So if this is it I'll pass on to the guy. Thanks again!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 952
|
![]()
The max I would take off the crank is .100 this gives you 2.00 rod journal and stroke of 3.75 I know some people have cut other stock cranks farther, but a LT-5 hollow crank??? I would not like to find out the hard way.
If shipping is a problem, getting the block here and back wont work for the 4.100/125. Unless AES or EES is selling the liners now? Last I heard they only do short block assembled. So your looking at sending 4" liners over sea's. 3.75x4.00 = 377ci Go with Ron Woods HD liners punch it .060 over = 388ci. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta or Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,736
|
![]()
Hey guys. Well here's what a person has to deal with. As stated by diaper boy Kevin, 2.0" is standard 'Small Journal' Small Block Chev., is a good size, bearings available no problem. Next is 'Large Honda' size, 1.889", then is 'Small Honda' size, 1.85", then is I.R.L. or Mitsubishi size, 1.779". I'm having a crank done right now by Dave at Mile High Crank in Denver & before anything can happen we have to make sure it won't be too thin where the rod journal lightening hole is. The other thing a person has to watch is the oil hole, the more it gets off-set, the oil hole will want to 'Walk Over' to the crank radius, too much & it'll bleed off pressure at the bearing edge, obviously. So can a factory LT-5 crank go to the I.R.L. size of 1.779" for an approx. stroke of 3.98"? I'm not sure...never taken one that far.....yet
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|