[xlr8nflorida]

406.1 '91 w/700 miles $33,000
620.1 '90 w/59k miles $16,500
643.1 '92 w/? miles $28,600
653 '90 w/4924 miles $32,450

It was about what I expected and they auctioned all the early years. The 5k mileage 90 brought fairly good $, the 91 was probably the best deal and the other 90 had a decent amount of mileage on it so never expected a great price on it.

I believe the trend has been level for the early cars, down for the rough early cars. The later years have definitely been downward for the time being but they will be worth the most in the future. Alot of people just are not going shell out $40-50k for a 15 year old car until the car comes into its own which will probably be at the 30 year mark.

The 91 was white/red - not a color that shows that great and white only appeals to select people.

90 with 59k miles is pretty much run of the mill driven car. It's fairly low selling price especially after backing out the commission but then again I didn't see the car. They all look good under the lights but how nice was it?

92 has no mileage so I can't comment

90 with 5k miles is where I would expect it to be price wise given the current economy.

I think if the right ZR-1's hit their auction you would see a difference.

The rare color cars , the 1 of 12, 1 of 19 and the later years and the colors that really pop. JMHO.

Maybe a Z with some Dymags etc.

I think it would garner more interest, more competitive bidding etc.

All the premium ZR-1's with fairly low mileage still retain good value.

I wouldn't sweat it - just enjoy the car.

I've had my Z 11 years and I can get what I paid for mine. That is a good deal in my opinion. I've lost 50% on my other 3

Vettes in the same time period. My Corvettes look basically like new when I'm done with them but those 3 had decent

mileage on them and mileage kills you every time in regards to resale value.

Thoughts from others?