Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????
 

Actually, I currently live in a county that does require emmissions, but, only if you drive a car more than 5,000 miles in a year. But, I will be transfering my residencey to Ohio on Jan 1. They have no emississions tests.

Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????
 

I will do wires while I'm there.

Coil Packs

....Is there a good test?
....Good quality Replacements?
....Aroundabout Cost?

Thanks all to have responded. No one around here knows anything about these!!!!!

Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????
 

Properly tuned in closed loop, (read: oxygen sensors engaged), mpg could actually improve.

That said, benefits far outweigh keepin' 'em, IMO!

Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????
 

Just wondering has anyone removed the secondaries and passed California emission test??

Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????
 

yes . i did the labor for a guy in porterville . we removed the secondaries and used marks reprogrammed prom and it passed . he sold the car since then and told the buyer passed also.

Re: LPE 475: Should I Eliminate Secondary Stuff If Changing Injectors?????
 

I empty the ash tray when it gets full of paper etc.
I could just toss it but what he heck.
Things that break on the car I just fix.
When it comes to the secondaries it's the same.
I fixed them in 99 and they worked fine until this year.
I rebuilt the air pump and I'm good to go for another decade.

One big reason I leave the secondaries in is to be able to remove
the power key any time i let someone drive it.
And it's a good conversation point.

Other systems that get pull that I choose not to are:
1. tire sensors
2. air bag
3. Cats
4. Bose system
5. FX system