Quote:
Originally Posted by LGAFF
based upon the test looks like a 393.6 would be the dynojet number
|
Thanks for the article, Lee. (I saved it as a Word doc for reference, but I wish we could see the graphs referred to tho.) As the article says, it's all relative, so pick one or the other and compare (modification) results. But, in the end: "(A time slip) talks, and (a dyno graph) walks!"
Dynojet produced my initial base line (SAE) results. So, I'll stick w/ the Dynojet, going forward, I recon. But, I do appreciate the the fact that the Mustang dyno will attempt to account for some actual loss factors, better than the pure inertia (Dynojet),
especially when comparing dissimilar vehicles: e.g.,
comparing a 730± hp Dodge Challenger (with aero properties close to a sinter block!) to a (Corvette).
Anyway... I'm very glad to see Demps opening his shop on the east coast. It will add to the availability where our beloved Zs can be properly serviced; promoting the efforts to "KEEPING THE LEGEND ALIVE"!
